93ed6: Difference between revisions

Line 3:

== Theory ==

93ed6 is nearly identical to [[36edo]], but with the 6th harmonic rather than the [[~~2/1|~~octave]] being just. The octave is stretched by about 0.757 [[cent]]s (almost identical to [[101ed7]], where the octave is stretched by about 0.770 cents). Like 36edo, 93ed6 is [[consistent]] to the [[integer limit|8-integer-limit]].

93ed6 is nearly identical to [[36edo]], but with the 6th harmonic rather than the [[octave]] being just. The octave is stretched by about 0.757 [[cent]]s (almost identical to [[101ed7]], where the octave is stretched by about 0.770 cents). Like 36edo, 93ed6 is [[consistent]] to the [[integer limit|8-integer-limit]].

Compared to 36edo, 93ed6 is pretty well optimized for the 2.3.7.13.17 [[subgroup]], with slightly better [[3/1|3]], [[7/1|7]], [[13/1|13]] and [[17/1|17]], and a slightly worse 2 versus 36edo. Using the [[patent val]], the [[5/1|5]] is also less accurate. Overall this means 36edo is still better in the [[5-limit]], but 93ed6 is better in the [[13-limit|13-]] and [[17-limit]], especially when treating it as a dual-5 dual-11 tuning.

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 == Theory ==
-ed6 is nearly identical to [[36edo]], but with the 6th harmonic rather than the [[2/1|octave]] being just. The octave is stretched by about 0.757 [[cent]]s (almost identical to [[101ed7]], where the octave is stretched by about 0.770 cents). Like 36edo, 93ed6 is [[consistent]] to the [[integer limit|8-integer-limit]].
+ed6 is nearly identical to [[36edo]], but with the 6th harmonic rather than the [[octave]] being just. The octave is stretched by about 0.757 [[cent]]s (almost identical to [[101ed7]], where the octave is stretched by about 0.770 cents). Like 36edo, 93ed6 is [[consistent]] to the [[integer limit|8-integer-limit]].
 Compared to 36edo, 93ed6 is pretty well optimized for the 2.3.7.13.17 [[subgroup]], with slightly better [[3/1|3]], [[7/1|7]], [[13/1|13]] and [[17/1|17]], and a slightly worse 2 versus 36edo. Using the [[patent val]], the [[5/1|5]] is also less accurate. Overall this means 36edo is still better in the [[5-limit]], but 93ed6 is better in the [[13-limit|13-]] and [[17-limit]], especially when treating it as a dual-5 dual-11 tuning.