Talk:Garischismic family: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:31, 30 April 2026 view source FloraC (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 25,053 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:03, 30 April 2026 view source Hotcrystal0 (talk \| contribs) 257 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 17:		Line 17:

	::: I don't think ''garisma'' fixes it as it's still associated with garibaldi. We have many ''-schismic'' names so I don't think that alone constitutes a problem either. I'm in principle not against renaming ''cassaschismic'' but I'm only willing to consider canonicalizing it w.r.t. one of the temps I mentioned above (including dual-naming). —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 18:31, 30 April 2026 (UTC)		::: I don't think ''garisma'' fixes it as it's still associated with garibaldi. We have many ''-schismic'' names so I don't think that alone constitutes a problem either. I'm in principle not against renaming ''cassaschismic'' but I'm only willing to consider canonicalizing it w.r.t. one of the temps I mentioned above (including dual-naming). —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 18:31, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
			:::I agree with FloraC here. It’s not much of a problem. <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0\|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0\|l0]]</span> 19:03, 30 April 2026 (UTC)