User:BudjarnLambeth/Draft related tunings section: Difference between revisions
→Octave stretch or compression: as I pointed out before, octave size is way better than step size. Unify to TE and 3 decimal places |
→Octave stretch or compression: mention 93ed6 |
||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
{{Harmonics in equal|57|3|1|columns=12|start=12|collapsed=true|title=Approximation of harmonics in 57edt (continued)}} | {{Harmonics in equal|57|3|1|columns=12|start=12|collapsed=true|title=Approximation of harmonics in 57edt (continued)}} | ||
If one intends to use both 36edo's vals for 5/1 at once, stretching the octave of 36edo by about 1{{c}} optimises 36edo for that dual-5 usage, while also making slight improvements to primes 3, 7, 11, and 13. This approximates all primes up to 11 within ''16.6{{c}}''. | If one intends to use both 36edo's vals for 5/1 at once, stretching the octave of 36edo by about 1{{c}} optimises 36edo for that dual-5 usage, while also making slight improvements to primes 3, 7, 11, and 13. This approximates all primes up to 11 within ''16.6{{c}}''. Several almost-identical tunings do this: 57edt, [[93ed6]], [[101ed7]], [[zpi|155zpi]], and the 2.3.7.13-subgroup [[TE]] and [[WE]] tunings of 36et. | ||
; 36edo | ; 36edo | ||