Talk:Porcupine family: Difference between revisions
m →Draft of revision: this is just a guess ofc |
|||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
:::::::::: Okay, but why is "comparing temperaments" in that manner the chief purpose for this? Porcupine and meantone are different systems, and one likely chooses porcupine and then proceeds to work in 2.3.5.11, or chooses meantone and then proceeds to work in 2.3.5.7. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 17:10, 17 May 2025 (UTC) | :::::::::: Okay, but why is "comparing temperaments" in that manner the chief purpose for this? Porcupine and meantone are different systems, and one likely chooses porcupine and then proceeds to work in 2.3.5.11, or chooses meantone and then proceeds to work in 2.3.5.7. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 17:10, 17 May 2025 (UTC) | ||
::::::::::: Let me tell you again. 2.3.5.11-subgroup porcupine is ''right there'' and no one's saying you shouldn't use it. But meanwhile 7-limit JI is as musically relevant as the 2.3.5.11 subgroup if not more, and one gets septimal porcupine and meantone simply by tempering 7-limit JI. Your assessment of likelihood is biased | ::::::::::: Let me tell you again. 2.3.5.11-subgroup porcupine is ''right there'' and no one's saying you shouldn't use it. But meanwhile 7-limit JI is as musically relevant as the 2.3.5.11 subgroup if not more, and one gets septimal porcupine and meantone simply by tempering 7-limit JI. Your assessment of likelihood is biased, possibly becuz you have little experience with JI. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:43, 19 May 2025 (UTC) | ||
== Rename of tridecimal porcupine == | == Rename of tridecimal porcupine == | ||