User talk:BudjarnLambeth/Notability guidelines: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Pages for intervals in Alpharabian tuning: Added some harder examples. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:: Makes sense. Unfortunately, 297/256 is but one of the easier examples to deal with- harder examples which I know have more substantial things written about them include [[8192/8019]] and [[4096/3993]]. I have yet to see what other's opinions of these intervals are. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 07:23, 6 May 2025 (UTC) | :: Makes sense. Unfortunately, 297/256 is but one of the easier examples to deal with- harder examples which I know have more substantial things written about them include [[8192/8019]] and [[4096/3993]]. I have yet to see what other's opinions of these intervals are. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 07:23, 6 May 2025 (UTC) | ||
::: According to most people on the Discord, those last two intervals you mentioned are too complex/niche to warrant their own dedicated pages, but they should still stay in main space - they would just be made into subheadings of the Alpharabian article, instead of having their own separate pages. But all the content would still be preserved. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 23:11, 6 May 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:11, 6 May 2025
Pages for intervals in Alpharabian tuning
Hey! I'm just looking over these guidelines, and I'm curious as to where pages like 297/256 go according to the standards of this document. I know I created a bunch of 2.3.11 interval pages, and I think the biggest deal concerning these intervals is that they provide a framework for certain interval categories- namely those related to quartertones- and they also have some bare usage purposes, which I'm still investigating. Any thoughts on these pages? --Aura (talk) 16:29, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- I have updated the section for intervals to add an option regarding this. I have yet to run it by the Discord though so they might reject it. --BudjarnLambeth (talk) 02:28, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- According to most people on the Discord, those last two intervals you mentioned are too complex/niche to warrant their own dedicated pages, but they should still stay in main space - they would just be made into subheadings of the Alpharabian article, instead of having their own separate pages. But all the content would still be preserved. --BudjarnLambeth (talk) 23:11, 6 May 2025 (UTC)