Talk:Diaschismic: Difference between revisions

Line 11:

:: – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 20:15, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

: I think the srutal vs diaschismic page is hopeless and I can't care less about it, which is why I created this page for a fresh start. Moreover I'd like to keep this place to discuss diaschismic as a 17-limit temp, like catakleismic as a no-17 19-limit temp, so of course I object to merging. Instead I'd like to eventually have one page for each 7-limit temp. As for the no-7 temp, it could remain under srutal vs diaschismic or changed to something like srutal archagall.

: I think the srutal vs diaschismic page is hopeless and I can't care less about it, which is why I created this page for a fresh start. Moreover I'd like to keep this place to discuss diaschismic as a 17-limit temp, like catakleismic as a no-17 19-limit temp, so of course I object to merging. Instead I'd like to eventually have one page for each 7-limit temp in the diaschismic family, tho this won't happen too soon. As for the no-7 temp, it could remain under srutal vs diaschismic or changed to something like srutal archagall.

: Canonicity of septimal diaschismic may be reasoned on the fact that the 5-limit optimum is around 46edo in certain optimization schemes, not significantly sharper.

: [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 20:39, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 :: – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 20:15, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
-: I think the srutal vs diaschismic page is hopeless and I can't care less about it, which is why I created this page for a fresh start. Moreover I'd like to keep this place to discuss diaschismic as a 17-limit temp, like catakleismic as a no-17 19-limit temp, so of course I object to merging. Instead I'd like to eventually have one page for each 7-limit temp. As for the no-7 temp, it could remain under srutal vs diaschismic or changed to something like srutal archagall.
+: I think the srutal vs diaschismic page is hopeless and I can't care less about it, which is why I created this page for a fresh start. Moreover I'd like to keep this place to discuss diaschismic as a 17-limit temp, like catakleismic as a no-17 19-limit temp, so of course I object to merging. Instead I'd like to eventually have one page for each 7-limit temp in the diaschismic family, tho this won't happen too soon. As for the no-7 temp, it could remain under srutal vs diaschismic or changed to something like srutal archagall.
 : Canonicity of septimal diaschismic may be reasoned on the fact that the 5-limit optimum is around 46edo in certain optimization schemes, not significantly sharper.
 : [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 20:39, 27 April 2025 (UTC)