Talk:Regular temperament: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Fredg999 (talk | contribs)
m Move high priority to talk page
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WSArchiveLink}}
{{WSArchiveLink}}
{{High priority}}


== Basic explanation of the concept ==
== Basic explanation of the concept ==
It might be nice if this page at least basically explained the concept that an abstract regular temperament means that no generator has a specific value yet but is still a range of values. At least that's my understanding after discussions with several folks on Facebook and Discord today. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 19:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
It might be nice if this page at least basically explained the concept that an abstract regular temperament means that no generator has a specific value yet but is still a range of values. At least that's my understanding after discussions with several folks on Facebook and Discord today. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 19:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC)


Line 11: Line 9:


== Papers ==
== Papers ==
We should probably include links to important external docs at the bottom, like Middle Path, Graham's "new paradigm" paper, maybe Tonalsoft pages, etc. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:26, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
We should probably include links to important external docs at the bottom, like Middle Path, Graham's "new paradigm" paper, maybe Tonalsoft pages, etc. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:26, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:54, 10 April 2025

This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion.

Basic explanation of the concept

It might be nice if this page at least basically explained the concept that an abstract regular temperament means that no generator has a specific value yet but is still a range of values. At least that's my understanding after discussions with several folks on Facebook and Discord today. --Cmloegcmluin (talk) 19:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Does the new intro (as added by Keenan Pepper) resolve this issue? --Xenwolf (talk) 09:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Yes, thank you very much. --Cmloegcmluin (talk) 14:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Papers

We should probably include links to important external docs at the bottom, like Middle Path, Graham's "new paradigm" paper, maybe Tonalsoft pages, etc. --Cmloegcmluin (talk) 15:26, 21 April 2021 (UTC)