Talk:Meantone family: Difference between revisions
m explain why vincenzo was deleted |
|||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
: Prime 47 in higher-limit Vincenzo is literally identified with 3/2. There is no point in including some harmony as high as 47 in a temperament if it is allowed to be tuned this far off. 47-limit Vincenzo would be useful if it actually reflected any high-limit structures. It does not. --[[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 20:12, 24 March 2025 (UTC) | : Prime 47 in higher-limit Vincenzo is literally identified with 3/2. There is no point in including some harmony as high as 47 in a temperament if it is allowed to be tuned this far off. 47-limit Vincenzo would be useful if it actually reflected any high-limit structures. It does not. --[[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 20:12, 24 March 2025 (UTC) | ||
: "deleting one of the highest-limit temperaments on the whole wiki seems like a bad idea" this would be true if the temperament was even remotely reasonable. It's basically only useful for detempers, in which case, someone doing a detemper of one of those edos doesn't need this temperament to do it, because they will just detemper the edo. To put into perspective how useless it is, tempering out [[25/24]] ([[dicot]]) is much more fruitful for detempers, because it meaningfully describes certain JI scales that have 5/4 and 6/5 subtend the same number of scalesteps, such as a generator sequence. --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 20:39, 24 March 2025 (UTC) | |||