Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy: Difference between revisions

Godtone (talk | contribs)
m Godtone moved page User:Godtone/Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy to Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy: includes a fair amount to get it started and i'll add more temperaments just in case it wasnt enough
Remove userpage template since this is a mainspace page
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Editable user page|Please add any valuable temperaments you can think of. Make sure to follow the format and consider carefully the number of notes needed for what set of odds and what the damage of the most off intervals is to classify it correctly.}}
This page is a work in progress, serving to document temperaments broadly by accuracy preference, and then approximately by subgroup focus, that is, what sort of harmonies, broadly speaking, the temperament is targetting. Under each accuracy and subgroup focus is found an incomplete list of temperaments, organized ''approximately'' by complexity (how many notes per octave are required). The complexity given is the note count per octave (or for no-2's, per tritave), with the set of odds used for deriving the complexity given. Sometimes two complexities are given and the average is taken for the purpose of ranking.
This page is a work in progress, serving to document temperaments broadly by accuracy preference, and then approximately by subgroup focus, that is, what sort of harmonies, broadly speaking, the temperament is targetting. Under each accuracy and subgroup focus is found an incomplete list of temperaments, organized ''approximately'' by complexity (how many notes per octave are required). The complexity given is the note count per octave (or for no-2's, per tritave), with the set of odds used for deriving the complexity given. Sometimes two complexities are given and the average is taken for the purpose of ranking.