Lumatone mapping for 94edo: Difference between revisions

Yourmusic Productions (talk | contribs)
Create Page.
 
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
There are many conceivable ways to map [[94edo]] onto the [[Lumatone]] keyboard. Only one, however, agrees with the [[Standard Lumatone mapping for Pythagorean]]. Note that due to the size of the edo, this only covers slightly over half of its notes.  
{{Lumatone mapping intro}} Note that due to the size of the edo, this only covers slightly over half of its notes.  
{{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=94|start=4|xstep=16|ystep=-9}}
{{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=94|start=4|xstep=16|ystep=-9}}




Since 94edo is a [[schismatic]] tuning, the best approximation to the 5th harmonic is the diminished 4th. There is an alternate diatonic scale based on [[Carlos Beta]] that makes [[5-limit]] chords easy to play, but it has a slight octave stretch and misses out even more notes.
Since 94edo is a [[schismatic]] tuning, the best approximation to [[5/4]] is the diminished fourth. There is an alternate diatonic scale based on [[Carlos Beta]] that makes [[5-limit]] chords easy to play, but it has a slight octave stretch and misses out even more notes.
{{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=94|start=84|xstep=15|ystep=-5}}
{{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=94|start=84|xstep=15|ystep=-5}}




If you want to be able to access the full gamut, the [[10L 2s]] mapping is the most efficient layout, although it only covers a little under three octaves and the best ratios are not as easy to play together as in a true [[diaschismic]] system.
If you want to be able to access the full gamut, the [[10L 2s]] mapping is the most efficient layout, although it only covers a little under three octaves and the best ratios are not as easy to play together as in a true [[diaschismic]] system.
{{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=94|start=76|xstep=8|ystep=-1}}
{{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=94|start=76|xstep=8|ystep=-1}}


{{Navbox Lumatone}}
{{Navbox Lumatone}}