Schismic–Mercator equivalence continuum: Difference between revisions
m Vertical fractions only have a place in display-style math |
Explain why the m-continuum is less interesting. Fix a formating problem |
||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
|} | |} | ||
We may invert the continuum by setting ''m'' such that {{nowrap|1/''m'' + 1/''n'' {{=}} 1}}. This may be called the ''counterschismic–Mercator equivalence continuum'', which is essentially the same thing. The just value of ''m'' is 2.17600… | We may invert the continuum by setting ''m'' such that {{nowrap|1/''m'' + 1/''n'' {{=}} 1}}. This may be called the ''counterschismic–Mercator equivalence continuum'', which is essentially the same thing. The just value of ''m'' is 2.17600… While the counterschisma is of comparable size as the schisma, it is way more complex, so this continuum does not contain as many useful temperaments at integer points. | ||
{| class="wikitable center-1" | {| class="wikitable center-1" | ||
| Line 131: | Line 131: | ||
== Mercator == | == Mercator == | ||
{{See also| Mercator's comma }} | {{See also| Mercator's comma | Mercator family }} | ||
Comma list: {{monzo| -84 53 }} | Comma list: {{monzo| -84 53 }} | ||