Nominal-accidental chain: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
m Update link for enharmonic equivalence, add reference for albitonic
Line 11: Line 11:
These pitches form a chain, with each one separated from the next by a specific interval. This interval can be said to generate the notation, or the notation can be said to be based on this interval. In diatonic circle-of-fifths notation, this interval has been a just or near-just 3/2. Other intervals are possible, and even desirable for certain edos like 13, 18, and 23.
These pitches form a chain, with each one separated from the next by a specific interval. This interval can be said to generate the notation, or the notation can be said to be based on this interval. In diatonic circle-of-fifths notation, this interval has been a just or near-just 3/2. Other intervals are possible, and even desirable for certain edos like 13, 18, and 23.


{{Wikipedia| Enharmonic equivalence }}
[[Enharmonic equivalence]] may arise from this approach, which is when the same pitch can have multiple names. People are often taught that C♯ is enharmonically equivalent to D♭ but this is only true in [[12edo]] and its multiples (24edo, 36edo, etc.). The same term is sometimes used to refer to equivalence in general, but each edo technically has its own equivalence. [[7edo]] has the type of equivalence that could be called ''chromatic equivalence'', for example.  
 
'''Equivalence''' may arise from this approach, which is when the same pitch can have multiple names. People are often taught that C♯ is enharmonically equivalent to D♭ but this is only true in [[12edo]] and its multiples (24edo, 36edo, etc.). The same term is sometimes used to refer to equivalence in general, but each edo technically has its own equivalence. [[7edo]] has the type of equivalence that could be called ''chromatic equivalence'', for example.  


== Specific notation schemes ==
== Specific notation schemes ==
Line 36: Line 34:
{{Todo| update |inline=1|comment=Find materials for these topics.}}
{{Todo| update |inline=1|comment=Find materials for these topics.}}


* The term "albitonic"
* The term "albitonic" (see [[Chromatic pairs]])
* [[Mark Gould]]'s connection of accidentals to [[bi-level MOS]]
* [[Mark Gould]]'s connection of accidentals to [[bi-level MOS]]
== See also ==
* [[Enharmonic]] (disambiguation page)


[[Category:Notation]]
[[Category:Notation]]

Revision as of 15:19, 24 December 2024

"Sharp" and "flat" redirect here. For the temperaments that used to go by those names, see Sharpie and Flattie.

This is a neologism for the common pattern in notating microtonal pitch systems. These are analogous extensions of basic Western musical notation.

Nominals are pitch elements that have specific names. In Western musical notation, these names are the seven letters A, B, C, D, E, F, and G (historically, H has also been used). In a pentatonic notation, there would be only five names.

English Wikipedia has an article on:

Accidentals are additional pitches that arise as modifications of the nominals. Unmodified pitches are natural notes. In diatonic circle-of-fifths notation, the additional pitches are denoted by adding sharps or flats to the natural notes. The sharp accidental denotes a pitch raise by a chromatic semitone, equivalent to a raise by 7 fifths minus 4 octaves. Conversely, the flat accidental denotes a pitch drop by the same amount. In equal temperaments, the number of steps this interval is mapped to is called the sharpness.

These pitches form a chain, with each one separated from the next by a specific interval. This interval can be said to generate the notation, or the notation can be said to be based on this interval. In diatonic circle-of-fifths notation, this interval has been a just or near-just 3/2. Other intervals are possible, and even desirable for certain edos like 13, 18, and 23.

Enharmonic equivalence may arise from this approach, which is when the same pitch can have multiple names. People are often taught that C♯ is enharmonically equivalent to D♭ but this is only true in 12edo and its multiples (24edo, 36edo, etc.). The same term is sometimes used to refer to equivalence in general, but each edo technically has its own equivalence. 7edo has the type of equivalence that could be called chromatic equivalence, for example.

Specific notation schemes

Diatonic
Nondiatonic
Unsorted

Related topics

Todo: update

Find materials for these topics.