Very low accuracy temperaments: Difference between revisions

Move ternary here
m Re-adopt template: Optimal ET sequence
Line 36: Line 36:
* POTE: ~3/2 = 600.000, ~7/6 = 301.997 (~6/5 = 298.003)
* POTE: ~3/2 = 600.000, ~7/6 = 301.997 (~6/5 = 298.003)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 2, 4 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 2, 4 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.019373
Badness (Smith): 0.019373
Line 51: Line 51:
* POTE: ~3/2 = 600.000, ~5/4 = 340.293 (~8/7 = 259.707)
* POTE: ~3/2 = 600.000, ~5/4 = 340.293 (~8/7 = 259.707)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 2, 4 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 2, 4 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.021810
Badness (Smith): 0.021810
Line 66: Line 66:
* POTE: ~3/2 = 600.000, ~7/6 = 322.080 (~6/5 = 277.920)
* POTE: ~3/2 = 600.000, ~7/6 = 322.080 (~6/5 = 277.920)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 2, 4e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 2, 4e }}


Badness (Smith): 0.018993
Badness (Smith): 0.018993
Line 81: Line 81:
* POTE: ~3/2 = 600.000, ~5/4 = 315.962 (~7/6 = 284.038)
* POTE: ~3/2 = 600.000, ~5/4 = 315.962 (~7/6 = 284.038)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 2d, 4 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 2d, 4 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.037537
Badness (Smith): 0.037537
Line 96: Line 96:
* POTE: ~3/2 = 600.000, ~5/4 = 318.173 (~7/6 = 281.827)
* POTE: ~3/2 = 600.000, ~5/4 = 318.173 (~7/6 = 281.827)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 2d, 4 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 2d, 4 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.033786
Badness (Smith): 0.033786
Line 151: Line 151:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 848.221
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 848.221


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 3, 7bc }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 3, 7bc }}


Badness (Smith): 0.053389
Badness (Smith): 0.053389
Line 166: Line 166:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 743.135
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 743.135


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 3, 5c, 8c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 3, 5c, 8c }}


Badness (Smith): 0.051293
Badness (Smith): 0.051293
Line 181: Line 181:
* POTE: ~7/5 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 782.604 (~15/14 = 182.604)
* POTE: ~7/5 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 782.604 (~15/14 = 182.604)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 4bcd, 6 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 4bcd, 6 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.056404
Badness (Smith): 0.056404
Line 200: Line 200:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/4 = 986.883
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/4 = 986.883


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 5c, 6 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5c, 6 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.059070
Badness (Smith): 0.059070
Line 238: Line 238:
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~7/4 = 1033.153 (~12/11 = 166.847)
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~7/4 = 1033.153 (~12/11 = 166.847)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 3de, 6 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 3de, 6 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.025592
Badness (Smith): 0.025592
Line 354: Line 354:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 685.809
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 685.809


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 2, 5c, 7 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 2, 5c, 7 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.026828
Badness (Smith): 0.026828
Line 388: Line 388:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 685.234
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 685.234


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 2cde, 5de, 7 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 2cde, 5de, 7 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.032521
Badness (Smith): 0.032521