User talk:FloraC: Difference between revisions

Line 96:

[[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 18:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

: Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I appreciate your professionality regarding editing the wiki.

:# Since you clarified this in the first entry, I think it's good now. The syntonic comma is also special cuz the article is about ''meantone''. In other temps you shouldn't see fractions of the syntonic comma.

:# The fractional Pythagorean-comma tunings are senseless enough – I've never seen anyone looking for them, nor are they technically compatible with RTT. If I were bolder I'd remove all the Pythagorean-comma and septimal-comma tunings alike, but I'd better consult the community first. The actual problem is, there's no point adding those information of fractional limmas or fractional apotomes cuz there's no other fractions. Also every edo has such an association: for 19edo it's a 1/19-(19-comma) tuning; for 31edo it's a 1/31-(31-comma) tuning.

:# I don't think closeness to an edo warrants an entry. Why would someone look for those instead of grabbing the exact edo tuning?

:# I appreciate the specification of vals you added. Thank you.

:# Thank you for correcting it.

:# You have a point here. I think 5edo should have a place there cuz it's a relatively low-numbered edo that defines the edge of a tuning range (5-odd-limit diamond monotone), making it significant. Some higher edos tho really just clutters the space, esp. those in the flattone or dominant range. Pls note that extensions like flattertone and dominant will eventually get their own pages and own tuning spectra. I can make this quickly happen, if someone asks. But I don't think a simple split of the spectrum is the best solution. For one thing, all the extensions are meantone extensions and all the 5-limit eigeninterval tunings still apply. I think it's a question of which range to put the focus on. For meantone it's prolly best to maintain a higher precision in the meantone range, for flattone higher precision in the flattone range, etc.

: [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:53, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

@@ Line 96: / Line 96: @@
 [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 18:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
+: Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I appreciate your professionality regarding editing the wiki.
+:# Since you clarified this in the first entry, I think it's good now. The syntonic comma is also special cuz the article is about ''meantone''. In other temps you shouldn't see fractions of the syntonic comma.
+:# The fractional Pythagorean-comma tunings are senseless enough – I've never seen anyone looking for them, nor are they technically compatible with RTT. If I were bolder I'd remove all the Pythagorean-comma and septimal-comma tunings alike, but I'd better consult the community first. The actual problem is, there's no point adding those information of fractional limmas or fractional apotomes cuz there's no other fractions. Also every edo has such an association: for 19edo it's a 1/19-(19-comma) tuning; for 31edo it's a 1/31-(31-comma) tuning.
+:# I don't think closeness to an edo warrants an entry. Why would someone look for those instead of grabbing the exact edo tuning?
+:# I appreciate the specification of vals you added. Thank you.
+:# Thank you for correcting it.
+:# You have a point here. I think 5edo should have a place there cuz it's a relatively low-numbered edo that defines the edge of a tuning range (5-odd-limit diamond monotone), making it significant. Some higher edos tho really just clutters the space, esp. those in the flattone or dominant range. Pls note that extensions like flattertone and dominant will eventually get their own pages and own tuning spectra. I can make this quickly happen, if someone asks. But I don't think a simple split of the spectrum is the best solution. For one thing, all the extensions are meantone extensions and all the 5-limit eigeninterval tunings still apply. I think it's a question of which range to put the focus on. For meantone it's prolly best to maintain a higher precision in the meantone range, for flattone higher precision in the flattone range, etc.
+: [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:53, 31 July 2024 (UTC)