Syntonic–diatonic equivalence continuum: Difference between revisions
Let the m-continuum be a thing |
More about the use of "m" and "n" |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''syntonic-diatonic equivalence continuum''' is a continuum of temperaments which equate a number of [[81/80|syntonic commas (81/80)]] with the [[256/243|limma (256/243)]]. | The '''syntonic-diatonic equivalence continuum''' is a [[equivalence continuum|continuum]] of [[regular temperament|temperaments]] which equate a number of [[81/80|syntonic commas (81/80)]] with the [[256/243|limma (256/243)]]. This continuum is theoretically interesting in that these are all [[5-limit]] temperaments [[support]]ed by [[5edo]]. | ||
All temperaments in the continuum satisfy (81/80)<sup>''n''</sup> ~ 256/243. Varying ''n'' results in different temperaments listed in the table below. It converges to [[meantone]] as ''n'' approaches infinity. If we allow non-integer and infinite ''n'', the continuum describes the set of all | All temperaments in the continuum satisfy (81/80)<sup>''n''</sup> ~ 256/243. Varying ''n'' results in different temperaments listed in the table below. It converges to [[meantone]] as ''n'' approaches infinity. If we allow non-integer and infinite ''n'', the continuum describes the set of all 5-limit temperaments supported by 5edo due to it being the unique equal temperament that [[tempering out|tempers out]] both commas and thus tempers out all combinations of them. The just value of ''n'' is 4.1952…, and temperaments near this tend to be the most accurate ones. | ||
256/243 is the characteristic [[3-limit]] comma tempered out in | 256/243 is the characteristic [[3-limit]] comma tempered out in 5edo, and has many advantages as a target. In each case, ''n'' equals the order of [[5/1|harmonic 5]] in the corresponding comma, and equals the number of generators to obtain a harmonic 3 in the generator chain. For example: | ||
* Superpyth (''n'' = 1) is generated by a fifth; | |||
* Immunity (''n'' = 2) splits its twelfth in two; | |||
* Rodan (''n'' = 3) splits its fifth in three; | |||
* Etc. | |||
At ''n'' = 5, the corresponding temperament splits the ''octave'' into five instead, as after a stack of five syntonic commas, both the orders of 3 and 5 are multiples of 5 again. | |||
If we let ''k'' = ''n'' + 1 (meaning ''n'' = ''k'' - 1) so that ''k'' = 0 means ''n'' = -1, ''k'' = 1 means ''n'' = 0, etc. then the continuum corresponds to (81/80)<sup>''k''</sup> = 16/15. Some prefer this way of conceptualising it because: | |||
* 16/15 is the classic diatonic semitone, notable in the 5-limit as the difference between 4/3 and 5/4, so this shifted continuum could also logically be termed the "syntonic-diatonic equivalence continuum". This means that at ''k'' = 0, 4/3 and 5/4 are mapped to the same interval while 81/80 becomes independent of 16/15 (meaning 81/80 may or may not be tempered) because the relation becomes (81/80)<sup>0</sup> ~ 1/1 ~ 16/15. | * 16/15 is the classic diatonic semitone, notable in the 5-limit as the difference between 4/3 and 5/4, so this shifted continuum could also logically be termed the "syntonic-diatonic equivalence continuum". This means that at ''k'' = 0, 4/3 and 5/4 are mapped to the same interval while 81/80 becomes independent of 16/15 (meaning 81/80 may or may not be tempered) because the relation becomes (81/80)<sup>0</sup> ~ 1/1 ~ 16/15. | ||
* ''k'' = 1 and upwards (up to a point) represent temperaments with (the potential for) reasonably good accuracy as equating at least one 81/80 with 16/15 seems like a good lower bound for a temperament intended to model JI. A good upper bound might be rodan (''k'' = 4), with the only exception being meantone (''n'' = ''k'' = (unsigned) infinity). (Temperaments corresponding to ''k'' = 0, -1, -2 are comparatively low-accuracy to the point of developing various intriguing structures and consequences.) | * ''k'' = 1 and upwards (up to a point) represent temperaments with (the potential for) reasonably good accuracy as equating at least one 81/80 with 16/15 seems like a good lower bound for a temperament intended to model JI. A good upper bound might be rodan (''k'' = 4), with the only exception being meantone (''n'' = ''k'' = (unsigned) infinity). (Temperaments corresponding to ''k'' = 0, -1, -2 are comparatively low-accuracy to the point of developing various intriguing structures and consequences.) | ||
| Line 99: | Line 104: | ||
|} | |} | ||
We may invert the continuum by setting ''m'' such that 1/''m'' + 1/''n'' = 1. This may be called the ''superpyth-diatonic equivalence continuum'', which is essentially the same thing. The just value of ''m'' is 1.3130… | We may invert the continuum by setting ''m'' such that 1/''m'' + 1/''n'' = 1. This may be called the ''superpyth-diatonic equivalence continuum'', which is essentially the same thing. The just value of ''m'' is 1.3130… The [[superpyth comma]] is both larger and more complex than the syntonic comma. As such, this continuum does not contain as many useful temperaments, but still interesting nonetheless. | ||
{| class="wikitable center-1" | {| class="wikitable center-1" | ||