Talk:Technologisma: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
My two cents |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:: I'd be much happier if it was simply ''chatsma''. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 00:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC) | :: I'd be much happier if it was simply ''chatsma''. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 00:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
::: I agree with Sintel, Aura, and Flora; it's a cringe-worthy name. Also, if the information about who named it is on the page, could we include ''why'' it is named what it is named, before everyone forgets? --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 03:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:10, 5 April 2024
Offensively stupid name. If I was in charge I'd ban you for vandalism.
Sintel (talk) 10:49, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
I wouldn't go so far, but it seems very random. Technically it works, I mean there's no confusion caused by this yet like some of Xenllium's names have, but I would prefer if this name was given to a comma which actually relates to AI in some way. CompactStar (talk) 16:57, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not going to lie, I don't like the unpronouncoble "gpt" stuck in the middle of the comma name. --Aura (talk) 17:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think you're just supposed to pronounce it by spelling out those letters like with the actual acronym, but it isn't clear from the capitalization. CompactStar (talk) 17:23, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Sintel, Aura, and Flora; it's a cringe-worthy name. Also, if the information about who named it is on the page, could we include why it is named what it is named, before everyone forgets? --Cmloegcmluin (talk) 03:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)