Ringer scale: Difference between revisions
m →Sketch of the proof: missing apostraphe |
|||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
By the construction of a ringer scale, we are given some [[val]] [[map]] <math>m : \mathbb{Q}_{>0} \to \mathbb{Z}</math> that satisfies <math>m(f(k+1)/f(k)) = 1</math> for all ''k'' in '''Z'''. (This can be checked by hand or by computer as we only need to check one period <i>P</i>'s worth of 1-scalestep intervals.) | By the construction of a ringer scale, we are given some [[val]] [[map]] <math>m : \mathbb{Q}_{>0} \to \mathbb{Z}</math> that satisfies <math>m(f(k+1)/f(k)) = 1</math> for all ''k'' in '''Z'''. (This can be checked by hand or by computer as we only need to check one period <i>P</i>'s worth of 1-scalestep intervals.) | ||
By induction this implies <math>m(f(k+s)/f(k)) = s</math> because the intervals from ''k'' to ''k''+1, from ''k''+1 to ''k''+2, ..., from ''k''+''s''-1 to ''k''+''s'' all multiply together. This also implies <math>m(f(k))=k,</math> proving ''f'' to be [[epimorphic]], therefore CS. {{qed}} | By induction this implies <math>m(f(k+s)/f(k)) = s</math> because the intervals from ''k'' to ''k''+1, from ''k''+1 to ''k''+2, ..., from ''k''+''s''-1 to ''k''+''s'' all multiply together. This also implies <math>m(f(k))=k,</math> proving ''f'' to be [[epimorphic]], therefore CS (see proof in the article [[epimorphic scale]]). {{qed}} | ||
== Ringer scales == | == Ringer scales == | ||