Talk:256/255: Difference between revisions

Line 44:

:::::: I prefer the cookie-cutter names for their simplicity and avoidance of introducing new names but if people prefer charmstone and charmstonic I don't really mind all that much, because "charm" does seem different enough from "charisma"/"charismic" and seems more specifically related to magic too (so potentially more fitting). Also, not sure where to put this but it's maybe worth noting that this comma is very important in [[srutal archagall]] as that temperament can equivalently (and very notably from the perspective of [[S-expression]]s) be described as "semitonic charismic". --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 00:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

::: Also, in regards to the alternative name "diasemitonisma", it strikes me as a bit cumbersome to describe the 2.3.5.17[12 & 22] temperament as "diasemitonic semitonic". It's not a bad name per se but what's wrong with the name change proposal? Charisma and Charismic already need renaming anyways and there are two fairly obvious options that seem fine and clearly related for what to change them to.

Revision as of 16:03, 5 January 2024 view source Godtone (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 2,289 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:15, 5 January 2024 view source Godtone (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 2,289 edits in regards to alternative name Newer edit →
Line 44:		Line 44:

	:::::: I prefer the cookie-cutter names for their simplicity and avoidance of introducing new names but if people prefer charmstone and charmstonic I don't really mind all that much, because "charm" does seem different enough from "charisma"/"charismic" and seems more specifically related to magic too (so potentially more fitting). Also, not sure where to put this but it's maybe worth noting that this comma is very important in [[srutal archagall]] as that temperament can equivalently (and very notably from the perspective of [[S-expression]]s) be described as "semitonic charismic". --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 00:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)		:::::: I prefer the cookie-cutter names for their simplicity and avoidance of introducing new names but if people prefer charmstone and charmstonic I don't really mind all that much, because "charm" does seem different enough from "charisma"/"charismic" and seems more specifically related to magic too (so potentially more fitting). Also, not sure where to put this but it's maybe worth noting that this comma is very important in [[srutal archagall]] as that temperament can equivalently (and very notably from the perspective of [[S-expression]]s) be described as "semitonic charismic". --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 00:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

			::: Also, in regards to the alternative name "diasemitonisma", it strikes me as a bit cumbersome to describe the 2.3.5.17[12 & 22] temperament as "diasemitonic semitonic". It's not a bad name per se but what's wrong with the name change proposal? Charisma and Charismic already need renaming anyways and there are two fairly obvious options that seem fine and clearly related for what to change them to.