No edit summary
 
Line 6: Line 6:


: After thinking a bit maybe simply moving it to "Absolute errors.." might be a bit misleading. My page is about the approximated notes(!) in the respective temperaments rather than the errors. The "Relative errors.." page does not list the approximated notes but only the errors. Not sure what a good approach would be. --[[User:Fabianvallon|Fabianvallon]] ([[User talk:Fabianvallon|talk]]) 14:12, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
: After thinking a bit maybe simply moving it to "Absolute errors.." might be a bit misleading. My page is about the approximated notes(!) in the respective temperaments rather than the errors. The "Relative errors.." page does not list the approximated notes but only the errors. Not sure what a good approach would be. --[[User:Fabianvallon|Fabianvallon]] ([[User talk:Fabianvallon|talk]]) 14:12, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
:: Imo those note names are very redundant in a page about errors. Error is determined by the interval, not pitch. That's why each row of the table is exactly identical. If you're looking for note names, the interval table in each edo page shows that. I'm also not sure about writing specifically about "popular edos" -- I think a list page like this should simply present all the data and let the reader decide what to make of it. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 12:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC)