User:Cmloegcmluin/APS: Difference between revisions

Equal multiplication isn't an "other tuning". This *is* equal multiplication. Also adopt a stricter def for "equal temperament"
Every step of EPD is a period so it doesn't make sense to compare n-APS to EPD. It's the unspecified APS that's equivalent to EPD. Try to clarify the dimensionality of the "p"
Line 7: Line 7:
== Formula ==
== Formula ==


The pitch of the ''k''-th step of an APS-''p'' is quite simply ''k''⋅''p''.
The pitch of the ''k''-th step of an APS-''p'' is quite simply ''k''⋅''p'' for a pitch (log-frequency) quantity ''p''.


== Relationship to other tunings ==
== Relationship to other tunings ==
Line 17: Line 17:
=== Vs. EPD ===
=== Vs. EPD ===


If specified, an APS will be equivalent to one period of some [[EPD|EPD, or equal pitch division]]. Specifically, ''n''-EPD-''x'' = ''n''-APS(''x''/''n''), for example 12-EPD1200¢ = 12-APS(1200¢/12) = 12-APS100¢.
If the ''n'' is not specified, an APS will be equivalent to an [[EPD|equal pitch division (EPD)]]. Specifically, ''n''-EPD-''p'' = APS(''p''/''n'') for a log-frequency quantity ''p''. For example, 12-EPD1200¢ = APS(1200¢/12) = APS100¢.


=== Vs. AS ===
=== Vs. AS ===
Line 58: Line 58:


[[Category:Equal-step tuning‏‎]]
[[Category:Equal-step tuning‏‎]]
[[Category:Equal divisions of the octave‏‎ ]]
[[Category:Xenharmonic series]]
[[Category:Xenharmonic series]]