Tp tuning: Difference between revisions
m Removing from Category:Tuning using Cat-a-lot |
Style. Contents still need to be reviewed |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Definition == | == Definition == | ||
If ''p'' ≥ 1, define the T<sub>''p''</sub> norm, which we may also call the T<sub>''p''</sub> complexity, of any monzo in weighted coordinates m as | If ''p'' ≥ 1, define the [[Generalized Tenney norms and Tp interval space|T<sub>''p''</sub> norm]], which we may also call the T<sub>''p''</sub> complexity, of any monzo in weighted coordinates m as | ||
<math> | <math>\lVert [ m_2 \ m_3 \ \ldots \ m_k \rangle \rVert_p = (|m_2|^p + |m_3|^p + \ldots + |m_k|^p)^{1/p}</math> | ||
where 2, 3, … , ''k'' are the primes up to ''k'' in order. In unweighted coordinates, this would be, for unweighted monzo b, | where 2, 3, … , ''k'' are the primes up to ''k'' in order. In unweighted coordinates, this would be, for unweighted monzo b, | ||
<math> | <math>\lVert [ b_2 \ b_3 \ \ldots \ b_k \rangle \rVert_p = (|b_2 \log_2 2 |^p + |b_3 \log_2 3|^p + \ldots + |b_k \log_2 k |^p)^{1/p}</math> | ||
If ''q'' is any positive rational number, | If ''q'' is any positive rational number, ‖''q''‖<sub>''p''</sub> is the T<sub>''p''</sub> norm defined by its monzo. | ||
For some just intonation group G, which is to say some finitely generated group of positive rational numbers which can be either a full prime-limit group or some subgroup of such a group, a regular temperament [[tuning map|tuning]] T for an abstract temperament S is defined by a linear map from monzos belonging to G to a value in cents, such that T (''c'') = 0 for any comma ''c'' of the temperament. We define the error of the tuning on ''q'', Err (''q''), as |T (''q'') - cents (''q'')|, and if ''q'' ≠ 1, the ''T<sub>p</sub> proportional error'' is PE<sub>''p''</sub> (''q'') = Err (''q'')/ | For some just intonation group G, which is to say some finitely generated group of positive rational numbers which can be either a full prime-limit group or some subgroup of such a group, a regular temperament [[tuning map|tuning]] T for an abstract temperament S is defined by a linear map from monzos belonging to G to a value in cents, such that T (''c'') = 0 for any comma ''c'' of the temperament. We define the error of the tuning on ''q'', Err (''q''), as |T (''q'') - cents (''q'')|, and if ''q'' ≠ 1, the ''T<sub>p</sub> proportional error'' is PE<sub>''p''</sub> (''q'') = Err (''q'')/‖''q''‖<sub>''p''</sub>. For any tuning T of the temperament, the set of PE<sub>''p''</sub> (''q'') for all ''q'' ≠ 1 in G is bounded, and hence has a least upper bound, the supremum sup (PE<sub>''p''</sub> (T)). The set of values sup (PE<sub>''p''</sub> (T)) is bounded below, and by continuity achieves its minimum value, which is the T<sub>''p''</sub> error E<sub>''p''</sub> (S) of the abstract temperament S; if we measure in cents as we've defined above, E<sub>''p''</sub> (S) has units of cents. Any tuning achieving this minimum, so that sup (PE<sub>''p''</sub> (T)) = E<sub>''p''</sub> (S), is an T<sub>''p''</sub> tuning. Usually this tuning is unique, but in the case ''p'' = 1, called the [[TOP tuning]], it may not be. In this case we can choose a TOP tuning canonically by setting it to the limit as ''p'' tends to 1 of the T<sub>''p''</sub> tuning, thereby defining a unique tuning T<sub>''p''</sub> (S) for any abstract temperament S on any group G. Given T<sub>''p''</sub> (S) in a group G containing 2, we may define a corresponding pure-octaves tuning (POL<sub>''p''</sub> tuning) by dividing by the tuning of 2: T<sub>''p''</sub>' (S) = 1200 T<sub>''p''</sub> (S)/(T<sub>''p''</sub> (S))<sub>1</sub>, where (T<sub>''p''</sub> (S))<sub>1</sub> is the first entry of T<sub>''p''</sub> (S). When ''p'' = 2, POL<sub>2</sub> tuning generalizes POTE tuning. | ||
== Dual norm == | == Dual norm == | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
== Applying the Hahn-Banach theorem == | == Applying the Hahn-Banach theorem == | ||
Suppose T = T<sub>''p''</sub> (S) is an T<sub>''p''</sub> tuning for the temperament S, and J is the JI tuning. These are both elements of G-tuning space, which are linear functionals on G-interval space, and hence the error map Ɛ = T - J is also. The norm | Suppose T = T<sub>''p''</sub> (S) is an T<sub>''p''</sub> tuning for the temperament S, and J is the JI tuning. These are both elements of G-tuning space, which are linear functionals on G-interval space, and hence the error map Ɛ = T - J is also. The norm ‖Ɛ‖ of Ɛ is minimal among all error maps for tunings of S since T is the T<sub>''p''</sub> tuning. By the [[Wikipedia: Hahn–Banach theorem|Hahn–Banach theorem]], Ɛ can be extended to an element Ƹ in the space of full ''p''-limit tuning maps with the same norm; that is, so that ‖Ɛ‖ = ‖Ƹ‖. Additionally, due to a [http://www.math.unl.edu/%7Es-bbockel1/928/node25.html corollary of Hahn-Banach], the set of such error maps valid for S can be extended to a larger set which is valid for an extended temperament S*; this temperament S* will be of rank greater than or equal to S, and will share the same kernel. ‖Ƹ‖, the norm of the full ''p''-limit error map, must also be minimal among all valid error maps for S*, or the restriction of Ƹ to G would improve on Ɛ. Hence, as ‖Ƹ‖ is minimal, J* + Ƹ, where J* is the full ''p''-limit [[JIP]], must equal the T<sub>''p''</sub> tuning for S*. Thus to find the T<sub>''p''</sub> tuning of S for the group G, we may first find the T<sub>''p''</sub> tuning T* for S*, and then apply it to the normal interval list giving the standard form of generators for G. | ||
Note that while the Hahn-Banach theorem is usually proven using Zorn's lemma and does not guarantee any kind of uniqueness, in most cases there is only one L<sub>''p''</sub> tuning and the extension of Ɛ to Ƹ is in that case unique. It is also easy to see that this can only be non-unique if ''p'' = 1 or ''p'' = | Note that while the Hahn-Banach theorem is usually proven using Zorn's lemma and does not guarantee any kind of uniqueness, in most cases there is only one L<sub>''p''</sub> tuning and the extension of Ɛ to Ƹ is in that case unique. It is also easy to see that this can only be non-unique if ''p'' = 1 or ''p'' = infinity, so that we may get a unique L<sub>''p''</sub> tuning (called the "TIPTOP" tuning for ''p'' = infinity) by simply taking the limit as ''p'' approaches our value. | ||
== T<sub>2</sub> tuning == | == T<sub>2</sub> tuning == | ||
In the special case where ''p'' = 2, the T<sub>''p''</sub> norm for the full prime limit becomes the T<sub>2</sub> norm, which when divided by the square root of the number ''n'' of primes in the prime limit, is the [[Tenney-Euclidean metrics|Tenney-Euclidean norm]], giving TE complexity. Associated to this norm is T<sub>2</sub> tuning extended to arbitrary JI groups, and [[Tenney-Euclidean temperament measures #TE error|RMS error]], which for a tuning map T is | In the special case where ''p'' = 2, the T<sub>''p''</sub> norm for the full prime limit becomes the T<sub>2</sub> norm, which when divided by the square root of the number ''n'' of primes in the prime limit, is the [[Tenney-Euclidean metrics|Tenney-Euclidean norm]], giving TE complexity. Associated to this norm is T<sub>2</sub> tuning extended to arbitrary JI groups, and [[Tenney-Euclidean temperament measures #TE error|RMS error]], which for a tuning map T is ‖(T - J)/''n'' ‖<sub>2</sub> = ‖T - J‖<sub>RMS</sub>. | ||
For an example, consider [[Chromatic pairs #Indium|indium temperament]], with group 2.5/3.7/3.11/3 and [[comma basis]] 3025/3024 and 3125/3087. The corresponding full 11-limit temperament is of rank three, and using the [[Tenney-Euclidean tuning|usual methods]], in particular the pseudoinverse, we find that the T<sub>2</sub> (TE) tuning map is {{val| 1199.552 1901.846 2783.579 3371.401 4153.996 }}. Applying that to 12/11 gives a generator of 146.995, and multiplying that by 1200.000/1199.552 gives a POT<sub>2</sub> tuning, or extended POTE tuning, of 147.010. Converting the tuning map to weighted coordinates and subtracting {{val| 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 }} gives {{val| -0.4475 -0.0685 -1.1778 0.9172 0.7741 }}. The ordinary Euclidean norm of this, i.e. the square root of the dot product, is 1.7414, and dividing by sqrt (5) gives the RMS error, 0.77879 cents. | For an example, consider [[Chromatic pairs #Indium|indium temperament]], with group 2.5/3.7/3.11/3 and [[comma basis]] 3025/3024 and 3125/3087. The corresponding full 11-limit temperament is of rank three, and using the [[Tenney-Euclidean tuning|usual methods]], in particular the pseudoinverse, we find that the T<sub>2</sub> (TE) tuning map is {{val| 1199.552 1901.846 2783.579 3371.401 4153.996 }}. Applying that to 12/11 gives a generator of 146.995, and multiplying that by 1200.000/1199.552 gives a POT<sub>2</sub> tuning, or extended POTE tuning, of 147.010. Converting the tuning map to weighted coordinates and subtracting {{val| 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 }} gives {{val| -0.4475 -0.0685 -1.1778 0.9172 0.7741 }}. The ordinary Euclidean norm of this, i.e. the square root of the dot product, is 1.7414, and dividing by sqrt (5) gives the RMS error, 0.77879 cents. | ||
| Line 44: | Line 43: | ||
[[Category:Math]] | [[Category:Math]] | ||
[[Category:Regular temperament tuning]] | [[Category:Regular temperament tuning]] | ||
{{ | |||
{{Todo| review }} | |||