Talk:Consistency: Difference between revisions
Dummy index (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
::: All edos are consistent in the 3-odd-limit since there's only 1, 3/2 and 4/3 to consider. 1 is by definition pure and closest. Take the closest 3/2 and that guarantees its octave complement 4/3 is closest too. The consistency is enabled by the patent val and not any other vals, so you're right that 18b is "inconsistent" tho consistency is defined for equal tunings rather than equal temperaments. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:45, 30 April 2023 (UTC) | ::: All edos are consistent in the 3-odd-limit since there's only 1, 3/2 and 4/3 to consider. 1 is by definition pure and closest. Take the closest 3/2 and that guarantees its octave complement 4/3 is closest too. The consistency is enabled by the patent val and not any other vals, so you're right that 18b is "inconsistent" tho consistency is defined for equal tunings rather than equal temperaments. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:45, 30 April 2023 (UTC) | ||
:: I have noticed that 23edo is consistent in the no-1's 7-limit ({1/1(3/3 and 5/5 and 7/7), 5/3, 3/5, 7/3, 3/7, 7/5, 5/7}). But this is not to say that we consider 23d, it was just almost consistent like a 23d. Direct approximation on 18edo gives 9/1 to odd-number steps, it can't be p-limit 18 nor 18b. | |||