Syntonic–chromatic equivalence continuum: Difference between revisions

+5-limit artoneutral
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 179: Line 179:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1/1, ~16/15 = 173.101
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1/1, ~16/15 = 173.101


{{Val list|legend=1| 6b, 7 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 6b, 7 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.1439
[[Badness]]: 0.1439
Line 198: Line 198:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~800/729 = 1\7, ~3/2 = 700.1870 (or ~81/80 = 14.4727)
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~800/729 = 1\7, ~3/2 = 700.1870 (or ~81/80 = 14.4727)


{{Val list|legend=1| 7, 70, 77, 84, 329 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 70, 77, 84, 329 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.341202
[[Badness]]: 0.341202
Line 217: Line 217:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~400/243 = 855.2127
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~400/243 = 855.2127


{{Val list|legend=1| 7, … 73, 80, 87 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, … 73, 80, 87 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.348
[[Badness]]: 0.348
Line 234: Line 234:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~10/9 = 1\7, ~3/2 = 706.288
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~10/9 = 1\7, ~3/2 = 706.288


{{Val list|legend=1| 7, 42, 49, 56, 119 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 42, 49, 56, 119 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.339335
[[Badness]]: 0.339335
Line 249: Line 249:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~125/108 = 1\7, ~3/2 = 706.410
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~125/108 = 1\7, ~3/2 = 706.410


{{Val list|legend=1| 7, 35b, 42c, 49c, 56cc, 119cccc }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 35b, 42c, 49c, 56cc, 119cccc }}


[[Badness]]: 0.4377
[[Badness]]: 0.4377