Xenharmonic Wiki

Syntonic–kleismic equivalence continuum: Difference between revisions

← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
Not everything here is worth documenting
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled
5,160 edits
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 98: Line 98:
[[POTE generator]]: ~675/512 = 442.2674 cents
[[POTE generator]]: ~675/512 = 442.2674 cents


{{Val list|legend=1| 8c, 11, 19 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 8c, 11, 19 }}


[[Badness]]: 1.061630
[[Badness]]: 1.061630
Line 115: Line 115:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~6/5 = 316.081
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~6/5 = 316.081


{{Val list|legend=1| 19, 148, 167, 186, 205, 224, 429, 653, 1082, 1735c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 148, 167, 186, 205, 224, 429, 653, 1082, 1735c }}


[[Badness]]: 0.317551
[[Badness]]: 0.317551
Line 128: Line 128:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~104976/78125 = 504.913
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~104976/78125 = 504.913


{{Val list|legend=1| 19, 126, 145, 164, 183, 713, 896c, 1079c, 1262c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 126, 145, 164, 183, 713, 896c, 1079c, 1262c }}


[[Badness]]: 0.373477
[[Badness]]: 0.373477
Line 141: Line 141:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~27/25 = 126.7237
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~27/25 = 126.7237


{{Val list|legend=1| 19, 85c, 104c, 123, 142, 161 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 85c, 104c, 123, 142, 161 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.653871
[[Badness]]: 0.653871
Line 158: Line 158:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~6/5 = 315.7501
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~6/5 = 315.7501


{{Val list|legend=1| 19, …, 1600, 3219, 4819 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, …, 1600, 3219, 4819 }}


[[Badness]]: 32.0
[[Badness]]: 32.0
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/w/Syntonic–kleismic_equivalence_continuum"