Quartismic family: Difference between revisions

Quartismic: +obvious extension
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 15: Line 15:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 701.9742, ~5/4 = 386.3137, ~33/32 = 53.3683
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 701.9742, ~5/4 = 386.3137, ~33/32 = 53.3683


{{Val list|legend=1| 21, 22, 43, 46, 65d, 68, 89, 111, 159, 202, 224, 270, 494, 742, 764, 966, 1236, 1506, 2159, 2653, 3125, 3395, 7060, 7554, 10949e, 14614e, 15850ee, 22168bdee, 23404bcdee, 26799bcdeee, 34353bcdeeee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 21, 22, 43, 46, 65d, 68, 89, 111, 159, 202, 224, 270, 494, 742, 764, 966, 1236, 1506, 2159, 2653, 3125, 3395, 7060, 7554, 10949e, 14614e, 15850ee, 22168bdee, 23404bcdee, 26799bcdeee, 34353bcdeeee }}


[[Badness]]: 0.274 × 10<sup>-6</sup>
[[Badness]]: 0.274 × 10<sup>-6</sup>
Line 28: Line 28:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 701.9695, ~5/4 = 386.3174, ~33/32 = 53.3698
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 701.9695, ~5/4 = 386.3174, ~33/32 = 53.3698


{{Val list|legend=1| 22, 43f, 46, 65d, 89f, 111, 159, 224, 270, 494, 764, 1012, 1236, 1506, 2901, 3125, 3395, 8026e, 8296e, 11421e, 11691e, 12927e, 13421e, 16322ee, 16816dee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 22, 43f, 46, 65d, 89f, 111, 159, 224, 270, 494, 764, 1012, 1236, 1506, 2901, 3125, 3395, 8026e, 8296e, 11421e, 11691e, 12927e, 13421e, 16322ee, 16816dee }}


[[Badness]]: 1.739 × 10<sup>-6</sup>
[[Badness]]: 1.739 × 10<sup>-6</sup>