Würschmidt family: Difference between revisions

m Hemiwürschmidt: correct comma basis
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 16: Line 16:
[[POTE generator]]: ~5/4 = 387.799
[[POTE generator]]: ~5/4 = 387.799


{{Val list|legend=1| 31, 34, 65, 99, 164, 721c, 885c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 31, 34, 65, 99, 164, 721c, 885c }}


[[Badness]]: 0.040603
[[Badness]]: 0.040603
Line 38: Line 38:
[[POTE generator]]: ~5/4 = 387.383
[[POTE generator]]: ~5/4 = 387.383


{{Val list|legend=1| 31, 96, 127, 285bd, 412bbdd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 31, 96, 127, 285bd, 412bbdd }}


[[Badness]]: 0.050776
[[Badness]]: 0.050776
Line 51: Line 51:
POTE generator: ~5/4 = 387.447
POTE generator: ~5/4 = 387.447


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 31, 65d, 96, 127, 223d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 31, 65d, 96, 127, 223d }}


Badness: 0.024413
Badness: 0.024413
Line 64: Line 64:
POTE generator: ~5/4 = 387.626
POTE generator: ~5/4 = 387.626


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 31, 65d, 161df }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 31, 65d, 161df }}


Badness: 0.023593
Badness: 0.023593
Line 77: Line 77:
POTE generator: ~5/4 = 387.099
POTE generator: ~5/4 = 387.099


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 3def, 28def, 31 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 3def, 28def, 31 }}


Badness: 0.034382
Badness: 0.034382
Line 94: Line 94:
[[POTE generator]]: ~5/4 = 387.392
[[POTE generator]]: ~5/4 = 387.392


{{Val list|legend=1| 31, 65, 96d, 127d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 31, 65, 96d, 127d }}


[[Badness]]: 0.064614
[[Badness]]: 0.064614
Line 107: Line 107:
POTE generator: ~5/4 = 387.407
POTE generator: ~5/4 = 387.407


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 31, 65, 96d, 127d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 31, 65, 96d, 127d }}


Badness: 0.033436
Badness: 0.033436
Line 124: Line 124:
[[POTE generator]]: ~5/4 = 387.881
[[POTE generator]]: ~5/4 = 387.881


{{Val list|legend=1| 34d, 65, 99 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 34d, 65, 99 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.086334
[[Badness]]: 0.086334
Line 137: Line 137:
POTE generator: ~5/4 = 387.882
POTE generator: ~5/4 = 387.882


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 34d, 65, 99e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 34d, 65, 99e }}


Badness: 0.058325
Badness: 0.058325
Line 156: Line 156:
[[POTE generator]]: ~28/25 = 193.898
[[POTE generator]]: ~28/25 = 193.898


{{Val list|legend=1| 31, 68, 99, 229, 328, 557c, 885cc }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 31, 68, 99, 229, 328, 557c, 885cc }}


[[Badness]]: 0.020307
[[Badness]]: 0.020307
Line 169: Line 169:
POTE generator: ~28/25 = 193.840
POTE generator: ~28/25 = 193.840


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 31, 99e, 130, 650ce, 811ce }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 31, 99e, 130, 650ce, 811ce }}


Badness: 0.021069
Badness: 0.021069
Line 182: Line 182:
POTE generator: ~28/25 = 193.829
POTE generator: ~28/25 = 193.829


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 31, 99e, 130, 291, 421e, 551ce }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 31, 99e, 130, 291, 421e, 551ce }}


Badness: 0.023074
Badness: 0.023074
Line 195: Line 195:
POTE generator: ~28/25 = 193.918
POTE generator: ~28/25 = 193.918


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 31, 68e, 99ef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 31, 68e, 99ef }}


Badness: 0.031199
Badness: 0.031199
Line 208: Line 208:
POTE generator: ~28/25 = 193.884
POTE generator: ~28/25 = 193.884


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 31, 68, 99, 130e, 229e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 31, 68, 99, 130e, 229e }}


Badness: 0.029270
Badness: 0.029270
Line 221: Line 221:
POTE generator: ~28/25 = 194.004
POTE generator: ~28/25 = 194.004


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 31, 68, 99f, 167ef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 31, 68, 99f, 167ef }}


Badness: 0.028432
Badness: 0.028432
Line 234: Line 234:
POTE generator: ~28/25 = 193.698
POTE generator: ~28/25 = 193.698


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 6f, 31 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 6f, 31 }}


Badness: 0.044886
Badness: 0.044886
Line 251: Line 251:
POTE generator: ~147/110 = 503.0404
POTE generator: ~147/110 = 503.0404


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 31, 105be, 136e, 167, 198, 427c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 31, 105be, 136e, 167, 198, 427c }}


Badness: 0.034814
Badness: 0.034814
Line 266: Line 266:
POTE generator: ~28/25 = 193.9021
POTE generator: ~28/25 = 193.9021


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 62e, 68, 130, 198, 328 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 62e, 68, 130, 198, 328 }}


Badness: 0.044848
Badness: 0.044848
Line 279: Line 279:
POTE generator: ~28/25 = 193.9035
POTE generator: ~28/25 = 193.9035


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 62e, 68, 130, 198, 328 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 62e, 68, 130, 198, 328 }}


Badness: 0.023388
Badness: 0.023388
Line 292: Line 292:
POTE generator: ~28/25 = 193.9112
POTE generator: ~28/25 = 193.9112


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 62e, 68, 130, 198, 328g, 526cfgg }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 62e, 68, 130, 198, 328g, 526cfgg }}


Badness: 0.028987
Badness: 0.028987
Line 305: Line 305:
POTE generator: ~19/17 = 193.9145
POTE generator: ~19/17 = 193.9145


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 62e, 68, 130, 198, 328g, 526cfgg }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 62e, 68, 130, 198, 328g, 526cfgg }}


Badness: 0.021707
Badness: 0.021707
Line 318: Line 318:
POTE generator: ~28/25 = 193.9112
POTE generator: ~28/25 = 193.9112


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 62eg, 68, 130g, 198g }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 62eg, 68, 130g, 198g }}


Badness: 0.029718
Badness: 0.029718
Line 331: Line 331:
POTE generator: ~19/17 = 193.9428
POTE generator: ~19/17 = 193.9428


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 62egh, 68, 130gh, 198gh }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 62egh, 68, 130gh, 198gh }}


Badness: 0.029545
Badness: 0.029545