Xenharmonic Wiki

21st-octave temperaments: Difference between revisions

← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
Completion
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, emailconfirmed
5,165 edits
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 33: Line 33:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~6615/5632 = 278.8998
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~6615/5632 = 278.8998


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 168, 357, 525, 882, 1407, 2289e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 168, 357, 525, 882, 1407, 2289e }}


Badness: 0.0949
Badness: 0.0949
Line 46: Line 46:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~168/143 = 278.9058
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~168/143 = 278.9058


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 168, 357, 525, 882 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 168, 357, 525, 882 }}


Badness: 0.0551
Badness: 0.0551
Line 59: Line 59:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~168/143 = 278.9036
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~168/143 = 278.9036


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 168, 357, 525, 882 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 168, 357, 525, 882 }}


Badness: 0.0319
Badness: 0.0319
Line 72: Line 72:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~168/143 = 278.9036
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~168/143 = 278.9036


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 168h, 357, 525, 882, 1407 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 168h, 357, 525, 882, 1407 }}


Badness: 0.0270
Badness: 0.0270
Line 85: Line 85:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~168/143 = 278.8971
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~168/143 = 278.8971


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 168h, 357, 525, 882, 1407 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 168h, 357, 525, 882, 1407 }}


Badness: 0.0199
Badness: 0.0199
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/w/21st-octave_temperaments"