Category talk:MOS transversals: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Symmetric vs MOS: new section |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The scales currently in this category are exclusively MOS transversals; to be specific, the scales are not MOS, but are JI detemperings of MOS scales. I think the category title "Symmetry" is unnecessarily vague and ambiguous. I suggest renaming the category to "MOS transversals", which would be a subcategory of "Transversals", but I'd like to see if someone has a better idea before I proceed. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 19:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC) | The scales currently in this category are exclusively MOS transversals; to be specific, the scales are not MOS, but are JI detemperings of MOS scales. I think the category title "Symmetry" is unnecessarily vague and ambiguous. I suggest renaming the category to "MOS transversals", which would be a subcategory of "Transversals", but I'd like to see if someone has a better idea before I proceed. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 19:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC) | ||
:I agree with this proposal, I think it makes good sense. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 19:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:43, 23 April 2023
Symmetric vs MOS
The scales currently in this category are exclusively MOS transversals; to be specific, the scales are not MOS, but are JI detemperings of MOS scales. I think the category title "Symmetry" is unnecessarily vague and ambiguous. I suggest renaming the category to "MOS transversals", which would be a subcategory of "Transversals", but I'd like to see if someone has a better idea before I proceed. --Fredg999 (talk) 19:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with this proposal, I think it makes good sense. --BudjarnLambeth (talk) 19:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC)