User talk:FloraC/Critique on D&D's terminology: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
: I don't think I'm finishing reviewing all the terms any time soon, but the existing sections can be taken as finished so far. I'll update the essay accordingly as you respond, and perhaps you'll wanna do it in a separate page in your own namespace. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 04:26, 30 March 2023 (UTC) | : I don't think I'm finishing reviewing all the terms any time soon, but the existing sections can be taken as finished so far. I'll update the essay accordingly as you respond, and perhaps you'll wanna do it in a separate page in your own namespace. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 04:26, 30 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
:: I'll probably avoid creating a critique-of-critique page on my namespace, so I guess I'll stick to discussion topics here. | |||
:: To set expectations up front, I can already see that for some of your critiques, you will almost certainly not change my mind. But I pledge to stay open to your point of view, and I can see that for some others of your critiques you may well persuade me, in part because you make good points, I care relatively little about the issue, Dave and I weren't in solid agreement about a choice to begin with, or some combination of these and possibly other factors. Thanks as always for taking my/our work seriously and spending the time and energy to engage with it, even when it is to offer constructive criticism like this. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:38, 30 March 2023
Quick note on GPV
As I messaged you on Discord, I do plan to engage with the rest of this, in particular after our RTT guide is finished being published. For now, though, just a quick note: our suggested replacement for "generalized patent val" is not "simple map". "Simple map" is the replacement for "patent val". Our replacement for "generalized patent val" is "uniform map". "Integer uniform map" is a synonym for "simple map". --Cmloegcmluin (talk) 15:53, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
When/how to respond
Hi Flora. I'm just checking in to see if you happen to have reviewed the whole guide by now, to see if you might have additions or revisions to your critique. And I'd like to know how best to respond to your criticisms — perhaps in discussion topics right here? I'm still busy looking for a job and need to focus on that effort, but I will get to this soon. Ultimately I suppose that for each of your criticisms the outcome will be one of the following:
- You convince me of your position, and I make the changes throughout the relevant pages.
- I convince you to withdraw the criticism, and you remove it from this page.
- We remain in disagreement, and the pages stay as they are.
--Cmloegcmluin (talk) 19:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think I'm finishing reviewing all the terms any time soon, but the existing sections can be taken as finished so far. I'll update the essay accordingly as you respond, and perhaps you'll wanna do it in a separate page in your own namespace. FloraC (talk) 04:26, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- I'll probably avoid creating a critique-of-critique page on my namespace, so I guess I'll stick to discussion topics here.
- To set expectations up front, I can already see that for some of your critiques, you will almost certainly not change my mind. But I pledge to stay open to your point of view, and I can see that for some others of your critiques you may well persuade me, in part because you make good points, I care relatively little about the issue, Dave and I weren't in solid agreement about a choice to begin with, or some combination of these and possibly other factors. Thanks as always for taking my/our work seriously and spending the time and energy to engage with it, even when it is to offer constructive criticism like this. --Cmloegcmluin (talk) 15:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)