Generator-offset property: Difference between revisions
m hmm this whole thing's wrong |
|||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
* A strengthening of the generator-offset property, tentatively named the ''swung-generator-alternant property'' (SGA), states that the alternants g<sub>1</sub> and g<sub>2</sub> can be taken to always subtend the same number of scale steps, thus both representing "detemperings" of a generator of a single-period [[mos]] scale (otherwise known as a well-formed scale). All odd GO scales are SGA, and aside from odd GO scales, only xyxz satisfies this property. The Zarlino and diasem scales above are both SGA. [[Blackdye]] is GO but not SGA. | * A strengthening of the generator-offset property, tentatively named the ''swung-generator-alternant property'' (SGA), states that the alternants g<sub>1</sub> and g<sub>2</sub> can be taken to always subtend the same number of scale steps, thus both representing "detemperings" of a generator of a single-period [[mos]] scale (otherwise known as a well-formed scale). All odd GO scales are SGA, and aside from odd GO scales, only xyxz satisfies this property. The Zarlino and diasem scales above are both SGA. [[Blackdye]] is GO but not SGA. | ||
== Theorems == | == Theorems ==<!-- | ||
=== Proposition 1 (Properties of SGA scales) === | === Proposition 1 (Properties of SGA scales) === | ||
Let ''S'' be a 3-step-size scale word in L, M, and s of length ''n'', and suppose ''S'' is SGA. Then: | Let ''S'' be a 3-step-size scale word in L, M, and s of length ''n'', and suppose ''S'' is SGA. Then: | ||
# The length of ''S'' is odd, or ''S'' is equivalent to xyxz. | # The length of ''S'' is odd, or ''S'' is equivalent to xxx...xyxz. | ||
# ''S'' is of the form ''a''x ''b''y ''b''z for some permutation (x, y, z) of (L, M, s). | # ''S'' is of the form ''a''x ''b''y ''b''z for some permutation (x, y, z) of (L, M, s). | ||
# If ''n'' is odd, ''S'' is abstractly SV3 (i.e. SV3 for almost all tunings). | # If ''n'' is odd, ''S'' is abstractly SV3 (i.e. SV3 for almost all tunings). | ||
Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
For (6), consider the mos ''a''X 2''b''W as chunks of X separated by W (tempering Y and Z together into W). Eliminating every other W turns it into a mos, because the sum of sizes of consecutive chunks of X (1st chunk with 2nd chunk, 3rd with 4th, ...) must form a mos. This is because the chunk sizes of X form a mos, and taking every ''k''th note of an ''n''-note mos where ''k'' divides ''n'' yields a mos. Since the result of setting X = 0 is the mos ''b''Y ''b''Z, ''S'' is elimination-mos. | For (6), consider the mos ''a''X 2''b''W as chunks of X separated by W (tempering Y and Z together into W). Eliminating every other W turns it into a mos, because the sum of sizes of consecutive chunks of X (1st chunk with 2nd chunk, 3rd with 4th, ...) must form a mos. This is because the chunk sizes of X form a mos, and taking every ''k''th note of an ''n''-note mos where ''k'' divides ''n'' yields a mos. Since the result of setting X = 0 is the mos ''b''Y ''b''Z, ''S'' is elimination-mos. | ||
--> | |||
=== Proposition 2 (Odd GO scales are SGA) === | === Proposition 2 (Odd GO scales are SGA) === | ||
Suppose that a periodic scale satisfies the following: | Suppose that a periodic scale satisfies the following: |