8539edo: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
+prime error table
Template; style; -typos
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox ET}}
{{Infobox ET}}
The '''8539 equal temperament''' divides the octave into 8539 equal parts of 0.1405 cents each. While it may strike many people as too large to be practical, it's seen actual use as a bookeeping device to keep track of higher-limit intervals which have been allowed to freely modulate, and has been proposed as a unit of interval measure, the [[tina|tina]] (see [http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/t/tina.aspx http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/t/tina.aspx].) This is because it is a very strong higher limit system, distinctly consistent through the 27 limit, and is both a [[The_Riemann_Zeta_Function_and_Tuning#Zeta EDO lists|zeta peak]] and zeta integral tuning. In the 13-limit, the only smaller systems with a lower logflat badness are 72, 270, 494, 5585 and 6079; in the 17-limit, that becomes 72, 494, 1506, 3395 and 7033. In the 19-limit, where it really shines, nothing beats it in terms of logflat badness until 20203. Some 17-limit commas it tempers out are 28561/28560, 31213/31212 and 37180/37179; in the 19-limit it tempers out are 27456/27455 and 43681/43680. 8539 is a prime number, and the tina as a unit of measure could be criticized on that basis; however some people prefer primes for this sort of job, as they don't imply a preference for one smaller edo over another.
{{EDO intro|8539}} While it may strike many people as too large to be practical, it has seen actual use as a bookkeeping device to keep track of higher-limit intervals which have been allowed to freely modulate, and has been proposed as a unit of interval measure, the [[tina]] (see [http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/t/tina.aspx http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/t/tina.aspx]). This is because it is a very strong higher-limit system, distinctly [[consistent]] through the 27-odd-limit, and is both a [[The Riemann zeta function and Tuning #Zeta EDO lists|zeta peak, zeta integral, and zeta gap]] tuning. In the 13-limit, the only smaller systems with a lower logflat badness are 72, 270, 494, 5585 and 6079; in the 17-limit, that becomes 72, 494, 1506, 3395 and 7033. In the 19-limit, where it really shines, nothing beats it in terms of logflat badness until 20203. Some 17-limit commas it tempers out are 28561/28560, 31213/31212 and 37180/37179; in the 19-limit it tempers out are 27456/27455 and 43681/43680. 8539 is a prime number, and the tina as a unit of measure could be criticized on that basis; however some people prefer primes for this sort of job, as they do not imply a preference for one smaller edo over another.


=== Prime harmonics ===
=== Prime harmonics ===

Revision as of 11:35, 10 February 2023

← 8538edo 8539edo 8540edo →
Prime factorization 8539 (prime)
Step size 0.140532 ¢ 
Fifth 4995\8539 (701.956 ¢)
Semitones (A1:m2) 809:642 (113.7 ¢ : 90.22 ¢)
Consistency limit 27
Distinct consistency limit 27

Template:EDO intro While it may strike many people as too large to be practical, it has seen actual use as a bookkeeping device to keep track of higher-limit intervals which have been allowed to freely modulate, and has been proposed as a unit of interval measure, the tina (see http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/t/tina.aspx). This is because it is a very strong higher-limit system, distinctly consistent through the 27-odd-limit, and is both a zeta peak, zeta integral, and zeta gap tuning. In the 13-limit, the only smaller systems with a lower logflat badness are 72, 270, 494, 5585 and 6079; in the 17-limit, that becomes 72, 494, 1506, 3395 and 7033. In the 19-limit, where it really shines, nothing beats it in terms of logflat badness until 20203. Some 17-limit commas it tempers out are 28561/28560, 31213/31212 and 37180/37179; in the 19-limit it tempers out are 27456/27455 and 43681/43680. 8539 is a prime number, and the tina as a unit of measure could be criticized on that basis; however some people prefer primes for this sort of job, as they do not imply a preference for one smaller edo over another.

Prime harmonics

Approximation of prime harmonics in 8539edo
Harmonic 2 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 23 29 31
Error Absolute (¢) +0.0000 +0.0007 +0.0079 -0.0005 -0.0122 -0.0077 +0.0218 -0.0075 +0.0428 -0.0421 +0.0165
Relative (%) +0.0 +0.5 +5.6 -0.4 -8.7 -5.5 +15.5 -5.3 +30.4 -30.0 +11.8
Steps
(reduced)
8539
(0)
13534
(4995)
19827
(2749)
23972
(6894)
29540
(3923)
31598
(5981)
34903
(747)
36273
(2117)
38627
(4471)
41482
(7326)
42304
(8148)