Optimization: Difference between revisions
-"Minkowskian" as it's a misnomer. Frobenius -> equilateral since Frobenius would imply the Euclidean norm |
→Norm: finish removing "minkowskian" |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
The Manhattan norm or taxicab norm aka ''L''<sup>1</sup> norm resembles movement of taxicabs in Manhattan – it can only traverse horizontally or vertically. A diagonal movement mounts to two steps. | The Manhattan norm or taxicab norm aka ''L''<sup>1</sup> norm resembles movement of taxicabs in Manhattan – it can only traverse horizontally or vertically. A diagonal movement mounts to two steps. | ||
The Chebyshevian norm aka ''L''<sup>infinity</sup> norm is the opposite of the | The Chebyshevian norm aka ''L''<sup>infinity</sup> norm is the opposite of the Manhattan norm – it is the maximum number of steps in any direction, so a diagonal movement is the same as a horizontal or vertical one. | ||
It should be noted that the dual norm of ''L''<sup>1</sup> is ''L''<sup>infinity</sup>, and vice versa. Thus, the | It should be noted that the dual norm of ''L''<sup>1</sup> is ''L''<sup>infinity</sup>, and vice versa. Thus, the Manhattan norm corresponds to the ''L''<sup>infinity</sup> tuning space, and the Chebyshevian norm corresponds to the ''L''<sup>1</sup> tuning space. The dual of ''L''<sup>2</sup> norm is itself, so the Euclidean norm corresponds to Euclidean tuning as one may expect. | ||
== Enforcement == | == Enforcement == |