Optimization: Difference between revisions
Clarify. Hopefully this defends the terminology choice here |
-"Minkowskian" as it's a misnomer. Frobenius -> equilateral since Frobenius would imply the Euclidean norm |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
The Euclidean norm aka ''L''<sup>2</sup> norm resembles real-world distances. | The Euclidean norm aka ''L''<sup>2</sup> norm resembles real-world distances. | ||
The | The Manhattan norm or taxicab norm aka ''L''<sup>1</sup> norm resembles movement of taxicabs in Manhattan – it can only traverse horizontally or vertically. A diagonal movement mounts to two steps. | ||
The Chebyshevian norm aka ''L''<sup>infinity</sup> norm is the opposite of the Minkowskian norm – it is the maximum number of steps in any direction, so a diagonal movement is the same as a horizontal or vertical one. | The Chebyshevian norm aka ''L''<sup>infinity</sup> norm is the opposite of the Minkowskian norm – it is the maximum number of steps in any direction, so a diagonal movement is the same as a horizontal or vertical one. | ||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
|+Table of common tunings | |+Table of common tunings | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Weight-skew\Order !! Chebyshevian<br>(''L''<sup>1</sup> tuning) !! Euclidean<br>(''L''<sup>2</sup> tuning) !! | ! Weight-skew\Order !! Chebyshevian<br>(''L''<sup>1</sup> tuning) !! Euclidean<br>(''L''<sup>2</sup> tuning) !! Manhattan<br>(''L''<sup>infinity</sup> tuning) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Tenney<br>Tenney-Weil || || [[TE tuning]]<br>[[TWE tuning]] || [[TOP tuning]]<br> | | Tenney<br>Tenney-Weil || || [[TE tuning]]<br>[[TWE tuning]] || [[TOP tuning]]<br> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | Equilateral<br>Equilateral-Weil || || [[Frobenius tuning]]<br>EWE tuning || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Benedetti<br>Benedetti-Weil || || [[BE tuning]]<br>BWE tuning || [[BOP tuning]]<br> | | Benedetti<br>Benedetti-Weil || || [[BE tuning]]<br>BWE tuning || [[BOP tuning]]<br> |