1920edo: Difference between revisions

Godtone (talk | contribs)
m seems to make sense in at least 43-limit if not barely also the 47-limit
Eliora (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox ET}}
{{Infobox ET}}
The '''1920 division''' divides the octave into 1920 equal parts of exactly 0.625 cents each. It is distinctly [[consistent]] through the 25-odd-limit, and in terms of 23-limit [[Tenney-Euclidean temperament measures #TE simple badness|relative error]], only [[1578edo|1578]] and [[1889edo|1889]] are both smaller and with a lower relative error. In the 29-limit, only 1578 beats it, and in the 31-, 37-, 41-, 43- and 47-limit, nothing beats it. Because of this and because it is a very composite number divisible by 12, it is another candidate for [[interval size measure]].
{{EDO intro|1920}}
== Theory ==
It is distinctly [[consistent]] through the 25-odd-limit, and in terms of 23-limit [[Tenney-Euclidean temperament measures #TE simple badness|relative error]], only [[1578edo|1578]] and [[1889edo|1889]] are both smaller and with a lower relative error. In the 29-limit, only 1578 beats it, and in the 31-, 37-, 41-, 43- and 47-limit, nothing beats it. Because of this and because it is a very composite number divisible by 12, it is another candidate for [[interval size measure]].


=== Prime harmonics ===
=== Prime harmonics ===