Constrained tuning/Analytical solution to constrained Euclidean tunings: Difference between revisions

+intro; correct wording (the "minor" is actually the minor matrix, not its determinant); +final tuning map of the example
m Frobenius -> equilateral Euclidean
Line 26: Line 26:
<math>\displaystyle P = WV^+VW^{-1} = W(AW)^+A</math>
<math>\displaystyle P = WV^+VW^{-1} = W(AW)^+A</math>


== CFE tuning ==
== CEE tuning ==
Let us start with CFE tuning (<u>c</u>onstrained <u>F</u>rob<u>e</u>nius tuning): there is no weight or skew, and the constraint is the octave.  
Let us start with CEE tuning (constrained equilateral-Euclidean tuning): there is no weight or skew, and the constraint is the octave.  


Denote the constraint by B<sub>C</sub>. In the case of CFE, it is the octave:  
Denote the constraint by B<sub>C</sub>. In the case of CEE, it is the octave:  


<math>\displaystyle B_{\rm C} = [ \begin{matrix} 1 & 0 & \ldots & 0 \end{matrix} \rangle</math>
<math>\displaystyle B_{\rm C} = [ \begin{matrix} 1 & 0 & \ldots & 0 \end{matrix} \rangle</math>
Line 171: Line 171:


== Example ==
== Example ==
Let us try tuning septimal meantone to CFE.  
Let us try tuning septimal meantone to CEE.  


Its mapping is
Its mapping is