POTE tuning: Difference between revisions
Explain why POTE is less good a term now |
m Links |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Destretched tunings''' are tuning optimization techniques with the [[tuning map]] scaled until a certain interval is just, that is, its stretch introduced in the optimization is removed. '''DTE tuning''' ('''destretched Tenney-Euclidean tuning''') is the most typical instance and will be the focus of this article. Otherwise normed tunings can be defined and computed analogously. | '''Destretched tunings''' are tuning [[optimization]] techniques with the [[tuning map]] scaled until a certain interval is just, that is, its stretch introduced in the optimization is removed. '''DTE tuning''' ('''destretched Tenney-Euclidean tuning''') is the most typical instance and will be the focus of this article. Otherwise normed tunings can be defined and computed analogously. | ||
The most significant form of DTE tuning is pure-octave destretched, which is assumed unless specified otherwise. This has been called the '''POTE tuning''' ('''pure-octaves Tenney-Euclidean tuning'''), although there are other ways to enforce a pure octave (→ [[ | The most significant form of DTE tuning is pure-octave destretched, which is assumed unless specified otherwise. This has been called the '''POTE tuning''' ('''pure-octaves Tenney-Euclidean tuning'''), although there are other ways to enforce a pure octave (→ [[Constrained tuning]]). POTE can be computed from [[TE tuning]] with all primes scaled until 2/1 is just. | ||
== Approximate Kees optimality == | == Approximate Kees optimality == | ||
The POTE tuning is very close, but not exactly equal to the [[ | The POTE tuning is very close, but not exactly equal to the [[KE tuning]]. | ||
According to a conjecture of Graham Breed, these tunings also approximately minimize the squared error of all intervals weighted by [[Kees height]], at least for full prime-limits. Graham showed this empirically in his [http://x31eq.com/composite.pdf composite.pdf] paper by measuring the results for different temperaments and of different prime limits. It remains open how closely these approximations hold in all cases. | According to a conjecture of Graham Breed, these tunings also approximately minimize the squared error of all intervals weighted by [[Kees height]], at least for full prime-limits. Graham showed this empirically in his [http://x31eq.com/composite.pdf composite.pdf] paper by measuring the results for different temperaments and of different prime limits. It remains open how closely these approximations hold in all cases. |