User talk:Godtone: Difference between revisions

Line 84:

::: Oh and the reason it appears in the edit history of 181 EDO is because I accidentally added the sentence to the wrong EDO as I had misremembered the number of the EDO, but I removed that sentence from the page for 181 EDO when I realised. I am sure that the one here is right: [[183edo#Prime_harmonics]]. 161edo is also quite a strong system so I am pretty sure that one is right as it came second to 183 EDO a lot. Note 161 EDO's great strength as a no-9's 21-odd-limit system. --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 19:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

:::: I think it's that you compare the given EDO ''to'' a range of EDOs. This was not clear (from my POV). I have tried to increase readability by placing the information regarding context at the beginning of the sentence. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:23, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:31, 6 March 2022 view source Godtone (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 2,444 edits m →Meaning of a sentence: HOPEFULLY FIXED ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:23, 6 March 2022 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →Meaning of a sentence: re (it's clear now) Newer edit →
Line 84:		Line 84:

	::: Oh and the reason it appears in the edit history of 181 EDO is because I accidentally added the sentence to the wrong EDO as I had misremembered the number of the EDO, but I removed that sentence from the page for 181 EDO when I realised. I am sure that the one here is right: [[183edo#Prime_harmonics]]. 161edo is also quite a strong system so I am pretty sure that one is right as it came second to 183 EDO a lot. Note 161 EDO's great strength as a no-9's 21-odd-limit system. --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 19:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC)		::: Oh and the reason it appears in the edit history of 181 EDO is because I accidentally added the sentence to the wrong EDO as I had misremembered the number of the EDO, but I removed that sentence from the page for 181 EDO when I realised. I am sure that the one here is right: [[183edo#Prime_harmonics]]. 161edo is also quite a strong system so I am pretty sure that one is right as it came second to 183 EDO a lot. Note 161 EDO's great strength as a no-9's 21-odd-limit system. --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 19:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

			:::: I think it's that you compare the given EDO ''to'' a range of EDOs. This was not clear (from my POV). I have tried to increase readability by placing the information regarding context at the beginning of the sentence. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 21:23, 6 March 2022 (UTC)