Sporklpony

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 23:59, 13 January 2022 view source FloraC (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 18,308 edits re ← Older edit		Revision as of 02:37, 14 January 2022 view source Sporklpony (talk \| contribs) 9 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:: I'm not sure. Is the difference only methodological? Since I don't see the difference in the definition of the objects from what's presented. Think about it, the equal temperament and the equal-step tuning are different objects, yet they haven't had their separate pages. So if for certain reasons the method can't be effectively discussed with equal-step tunings, it needs to be elaborated. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 23:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)		:: I'm not sure. Is the difference only methodological? Since I don't see the difference in the definition of the objects from what's presented. Think about it, the equal temperament and the equal-step tuning are different objects, yet they haven't had their separate pages. So if for certain reasons the method can't be effectively discussed with equal-step tunings, it needs to be elaborated. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 23:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

			::: I see, thinking about things as objects as opposed to methods makes more sense. I don't think EDI adds anything new to equal-step tuning in that case. I'll change the page to a redirect. For my own reference, is there a page about combining different xenharmonic objects (like how 12TET and equal-step tunings are combined in the examples I provided on the page)? Thank you! [[User:Sporklpony\|Sporklpony]] ([[User talk:Sporklpony\|talk]]) 21:37, 13 January 2022 (ETC)