4/3: Difference between revisions

Aura (talk | contribs)
Found something on the linked Wikipedia page that seems to be appropriate to mention here as well.
Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
{{Wikipedia|Perfect fourth}}
{{Wikipedia|Perfect fourth}}


'''4/3''' is the [[frequency ratio]] of the '''just perfect fourth'''. Its inversion is the perfect fifth, [[3/2]]. In the [[Wikipedia: Medieval music #Early polyphony: organum|florid organum]] of Medieval music, 4/3 was reliably considered a consonance, and indeed was frequently emphasized.  Once major thirds with a tuning approximating [[5/4]] began to be treated as consonances, however, the perception of 4/3 was altered to where it was at times considered a dissonance.  However, as of late, the perfect fourth is once again being reevaluated as a consonance.
'''4/3''' is the [[frequency ratio]] of the '''just perfect fourth''', which is easily one of the more heavily discussed intervals outside of xenharmony- in fact, some of these usages have gone on to inspire other music theories within xenharmonic contexts, such as certain ideas about [[tetrachord]]s. As its inversion is the perfect fifth, [[3/2]], 4/3 is the [[octave reduced]] form of the third [[subharmonic]]. In the [[Wikipedia: Medieval music #Early polyphony: organum|florid organum]] of Medieval music, 4/3 was reliably considered a consonance, and indeed was frequently emphasized.  Once major thirds with a tuning approximating [[5/4]] began to be treated as consonances, however, the perception of 4/3 was altered to where it was at times considered a dissonance.  However, as of late, the perfect fourth is once again being reevaluated as a consonance.
 
The 4/3 interval is easily heavily discussed outside of xenharmony. In fact, some of the usages discussed there have gone on to inspire other music theories in xenharmonic contexts, and indeed continue to inform certain ideas about [[tetrachord]]s.


== See also ==
== See also ==
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/w/4/3"