Talk:Normal forms: Difference between revisions

Line 144:

:::::::::::::: Re: names. You've done it again, i.e. in my previous comment I began to anticipate a point I thought you might make, but ended up cutting it. In this case the point was about how "Benedetti" is at least a word you don't hear every day. So I could imagine for people with other learning styles, who can do a one-time match of "Benedetti height" with the concept and retain it strongly, then the distinctiveness of "Benedetti" could be superior. Anyway. Naming is hard. I expect you're familiar with the adage about the two hardest things in computer science being cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors. Heh. Looking forward to your edits. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 01:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

::::::::::::::: I've reworked it and pls give it a review. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 14:39, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:20, 2 October 2021 view source Cmloegcmluin (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,160 edits →How best to handle the new canonical form for RTT matrices w/r/t normal form ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:39, 2 October 2021 view source FloraC (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 18,328 edits re Newer edit →
Line 144:		Line 144:

	:::::::::::::: Re: names. You've done it again, i.e. in my previous comment I began to anticipate a point I thought you might make, but ended up cutting it. In this case the point was about how "Benedetti" is at least a word you don't hear every day. So I could imagine for people with other learning styles, who can do a one-time match of "Benedetti height" with the concept and retain it strongly, then the distinctiveness of "Benedetti" could be superior. Anyway. Naming is hard. I expect you're familiar with the adage about the two hardest things in computer science being cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors. Heh. Looking forward to your edits. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 01:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)		:::::::::::::: Re: names. You've done it again, i.e. in my previous comment I began to anticipate a point I thought you might make, but ended up cutting it. In this case the point was about how "Benedetti" is at least a word you don't hear every day. So I could imagine for people with other learning styles, who can do a one-time match of "Benedetti height" with the concept and retain it strongly, then the distinctiveness of "Benedetti" could be superior. Anyway. Naming is hard. I expect you're familiar with the adage about the two hardest things in computer science being cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors. Heh. Looking forward to your edits. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 01:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

			::::::::::::::: I've reworked it and pls give it a review. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 14:39, 2 October 2021 (UTC)