Consistency: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m small correction |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
Formally, for some real ''d'' > 0, a chord C is consistent to span ''d'' in ''n'' ED''k'' if there exists an approximation C' of C in ''n'' ED''k'' such that: | Formally, for some real ''d'' > 0, a chord C is consistent to span ''d'' in ''n'' ED''k'' if there exists an approximation C' of C in ''n'' ED''k'' such that: | ||
* every instance of an interval in C is mapped to the same size in C', and | * every instance of an interval in C is mapped to the same size in C', and | ||
* all intervals in C' are off from their corresponding intervals in C by less than 1/(2''d'') ED''k''. | * all intervals in C' are off from their corresponding intervals in C by less than 1/(2''d'') steps of ''n'' ED''k''. | ||
This more formal definition also provides an interesting generalisation of ''d'' from the naturals to the positive reals, as ''consistency to distance 1/2'' can be interpreted as meaning that all intervals in C are ''at worst'' represented using their second-best mapping, which can be tolerable for some purposes assuming sufficiently small steps. "Consistency to distance 1/2" can be nicknamed "semiconsistency", in which case ''C' '' is said to be a "semiconsistent" representation/approximation of C. | This more formal definition also provides an interesting generalisation of ''d'' from the naturals to the positive reals, as ''consistency to distance 1/2'' can be interpreted as meaning that all intervals in C are ''at worst'' represented using their second-best mapping, which can be tolerable for some purposes assuming sufficiently small steps. "Consistency to distance 1/2" can be nicknamed "semiconsistency", in which case ''C' '' is said to be a "semiconsistent" representation/approximation of C. |