Talk:159edo: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:07, 7 January 2021 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:08, 7 January 2021 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 71:		Line 71:
	::: It looks like there are multiple types of n-consistency being proposed even within the Facebook group, so yes, we need a discussion on this. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 19:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)		::: It looks like there are multiple types of n-consistency being proposed even within the Facebook group, so yes, we need a discussion on this. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 19:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

	::: I must point out that the degree of n-consistency that I look for on "an interval set S" has everything to do with whether or not you can go around a complete circle of fifths without accumulating a relative error of 50%. That's the specific type of n-consistency that I think I can regard as "complete". --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 19:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)		::: I must point out that the degree of n-consistency that I look for on "an interval set S" in the 3-limit has everything to do with whether or not you can go around a complete circle of fifths without accumulating a relative error of 50%. That's the specific type of n-consistency that I think I can regard as "complete". --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 19:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)