Talk:159edo: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
: How then do you judge inconsistency? I note that [[128/125]], when approached by way of a chain of [[5/4]] intervals doesn't match the step that best fits [[128/125]] directly in terms of absolute error, and I have the same problem with [[49/32]]. I also noted that Mercator's comma is less than half the size of a single step in 159edo, so why is what I said about that entirely wrong? Please do tell. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC) | : How then do you judge inconsistency? I note that [[128/125]], when approached by way of a chain of [[5/4]] intervals doesn't match the step that best fits [[128/125]] directly in terms of absolute error, and I have the same problem with [[49/32]]. I also noted that Mercator's comma is less than half the size of a single step in 159edo, so why is what I said about that entirely wrong? Please do tell. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
: Also, I wasn't talking about odd-limit here, I was talking about prime limit. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC) | : Also, I wasn't talking about odd-limit here, I was talking about prime limit. I agree that there's only one reasonable mapping for 5/4 and 7/4, but once you get beyond the 17-odd-limit, that's where we start to have issues. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC) | ||