Consistency: Difference between revisions

Line 5:

| ja = 一貫性

}}

An [[edo]] represents the q-[[odd limit]] '''consistently''' if the best approximations of the odd harmonics of the q-odd limit in that edo also give the best approximations of all the differences between these odd harmonics; for example, the difference between the best 7/4 and the best 5/4 is also the best 7/5. This word can actually be used with any set of odd harmonics: e.g. [[12edo]] is consistent in the no-11's, no 13's 19-odd limit, i.e. the odd harmonics 3, 5, 7, 9, 15, 17, and 19.

An [[edo]] represents the q-[[odd limit]] '''consistently''' if the best approximations of the odd harmonics of the q-odd limit in that edo also give the best approximations of all the differences between these odd harmonics; for example, the difference between the best 7/4 and the best 5/4 is also the best 7/5. This word can actually be used with any set of odd harmonics: e.g. [[12edo]] is consistent in the no-11's, no 13's 19-odd limit, i.e. the odd harmonics 3, 5, 7, 9, 15, 17, and 19. A different formulation: an edo represents a chord C '''consistently''' if there exists an approximation of the chord in the edo such that no interval within the chord has to be off by more than 50% of an edo step. In this formulation, 12edo represents the chord 1:3:5:7:17:19 consistently.

The concept only makes sense for edos and not for non-edo rank-2 (or higher) temperaments, since in these tunings you can get any ratio you want to arbitary accuracy by piling up a lot of generators.

Line 11:

Stated more mathematically, if N-edo is an [[equal division of the octave]], and if for any interval r, N(r) is the best N-edo approximation to r, then N is '''consistent''' with respect to a set of intervals S if for any two intervals a and b in S where ab is also in S, N(ab) = N(a) + N(b). Normally this is considered when S is the set of [[Odd limit|q odd limit intervals]], consisting of everything of the form 2^n u/v, where u and v are odd integers less than or equal to q. N is then said to be ''q limit consistent''. If each interval in the q-limit is mapped to a unique value by N, then it said to be ''uniquely q limit consistent''.

~~Page~~ ''[[Minimal consistent EDOs]]'' shows the smallest edo that is consistent or uniquely consistent in a given odd limit while page ''[[Consistency levels of small EDOs]]'' shows the largest odd limit that a given edo is consistent or uniquely consistent in.

N is '''strongly consistent''' with respect to a chord if

The page ''[[Minimal consistent EDOs]]'' shows the smallest edo that is consistent or uniquely consistent in a given odd limit while the page ''[[Consistency levels of small EDOs]]'' shows the largest odd limit that a given edo is consistent or uniquely consistent in.

==Examples==

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 | ja = 一貫性
 }}
-An [[edo]] represents the q-[[odd limit]] '''consistently''' if the best approximations of the odd harmonics of the q-odd limit in that edo also give the best approximations of all the differences between these odd harmonics; for example, the difference between the best 7/4 and the best 5/4 is also the best 7/5. This word can actually be used with any set of odd harmonics: e.g. [[12edo]] is consistent in the no-11's, no 13's 19-odd limit, i.e. the odd harmonics 3, 5, 7, 9, 15, 17, and 19.
+An [[edo]] represents the q-[[odd limit]] '''consistently''' if the best approximations of the odd harmonics of the q-odd limit in that edo also give the best approximations of all the differences between these odd harmonics; for example, the difference between the best 7/4 and the best 5/4 is also the best 7/5. This word can actually be used with any set of odd harmonics: e.g. [[12edo]] is consistent in the no-11's, no 13's 19-odd limit, i.e. the odd harmonics 3, 5, 7, 9, 15, 17, and 19. A different formulation: an edo represents a chord C '''consistently''' if there exists an approximation of the chord in the edo such that no interval within the chord has to be off by more than 50% of an edo step. In this formulation, 12edo represents the chord 1:3:5:7:17:19 consistently.
 The concept only makes sense for edos and not for non-edo rank-2 (or higher) temperaments, since in these tunings you can get any ratio you want to arbitary accuracy by piling up a lot of generators.
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 Stated more mathematically, if N-edo is an [[equal division of the octave]], and if for any interval r, N(r) is the best N-edo approximation to r, then N is '''consistent''' with respect to a set of intervals S if for any two intervals a and b in S where ab is also in S, N(ab) = N(a) + N(b). Normally this is considered when S is the set of [[Odd limit|q odd limit intervals]], consisting of everything of the form 2^n u/v, where u and v are odd integers less than or equal to q. N is then said to be ''q limit consistent''. If each interval in the q-limit is mapped to a unique value by N, then it said to be ''uniquely q limit consistent''.
-Page ''[[Minimal consistent EDOs]]'' shows the smallest edo that is consistent or uniquely consistent in a given odd limit while page ''[[Consistency levels of small EDOs]]'' shows the largest odd limit that a given edo is consistent or uniquely consistent in.
+N is '''strongly consistent''' with respect to a chord if
+The page ''[[Minimal consistent EDOs]]'' shows the smallest edo that is consistent or uniquely consistent in a given odd limit while the page ''[[Consistency levels of small EDOs]]'' shows the largest odd limit that a given edo is consistent or uniquely consistent in.
 ==Examples==