User talk:Aura/Aura's Diatonic Scales: Difference between revisions
m →Link text: typo fixed |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
In my opinion, "Wikipedia article" is probably the worst text to chose for a link if there are more than one article you refer to. Imagine you only read/only copy/only print the text, all information where to look will be lost (Wikipedia has lots of articles). The easiest option to do better is using an interwiki-style link (i.e. ''see [[Wikipedia:Mediant]]'' or ''see [[Wikipedia: Mediant]]''), another option is copy the original HTML title and URL (i.e. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediant Mediant - Wikipedia]) - maybe your browser has a plugin for that. At the risk of repeating myself: I really don't like these A/B links. They complicate the reading without bringing any advantage. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 15:27, 21 December 2020 (UTC) | In my opinion, "Wikipedia article" is probably the worst text to chose for a link if there are more than one article you refer to. Imagine you only read/only copy/only print the text, all information where to look will be lost (Wikipedia has lots of articles). The easiest option to do better is using an interwiki-style link (i.e. ''see [[Wikipedia:Mediant]]'' or ''see [[Wikipedia: Mediant]]''), another option is copy the original HTML title and URL (i.e. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediant Mediant - Wikipedia]) - maybe your browser has a plugin for that. At the risk of repeating myself: I really don't like these A/B links. They complicate the reading without bringing any advantage. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 15:27, 21 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
: Right, I attempted to fix it with links in the style of [[Wikipedia:Mediant]]. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:38, 21 December 2020 (UTC) |