Template talk:Infobox ET: Difference between revisions

Line 9:

: I'll be honest, I do think that there should be two sets of criteria for including a subgroup- superb, and passable. I'm thinking the EDO's superb subgroup representation range would be less than 3.5 cents of absolute error for base intervals in a given subgroup- e.g. 12edo and 53edo could both be considered superb at representing both [[3/2]] and [[4/3]] because of the differences from just intonation being less than 3.5 cents. Meanwhile, I'm thinking the EDO's passable subgroup representation range would involve differences of less than half of a step for said EDO- e.g. 12edo's representation of [[5/4]] and [[8/5]] is passable because the absolute error rates are less than half a step. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:35, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

:: This is exact the reason why I'd say only those criteria should go in the infobox that are indisputable and concise. The [[patent val]] for instance would be of such kind. I mean, It's obvious that all things in the box will gain higher attention of the reader. But if we try to expand the box to an article of it's own, we loose both, the attraction of the box on one hand and the quality of the surrounding article on the other hand. IOW: keep it short. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:12, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

=== Fifth type ===

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 : I'll be honest, I do think that there should be two sets of criteria for including a subgroup- superb, and passable.  I'm thinking the EDO's superb subgroup representation range would be less than 3.5 cents of absolute error for base intervals in a given subgroup- e.g. 12edo and 53edo could both be considered superb at representing both [[3/2]] and [[4/3]] because of the differences from just intonation being less than 3.5 cents.  Meanwhile, I'm thinking the EDO's passable subgroup representation range would involve differences of less than half of a step for said EDO- e.g. 12edo's representation of [[5/4]] and [[8/5]] is passable because the absolute error rates are less than half a step. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:35, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
+:: This is exact the reason why I'd say only those criteria should go in the infobox that are indisputable and concise. The [[patent val]] for instance would be of such kind. I mean, It's obvious that all things in the box will gain higher attention of the reader. But if we try to expand the box to an article of it's own, we loose both, the attraction of the box on one hand and the quality of the surrounding article on the other hand. IOW: keep it short. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:12, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 === Fifth type ===