Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 137: Line 137:
* Since 1089/1024 is (33/32)^2, modifying a Pythagorean interval by [[33/32]] always results in an interval that is considered "Alpharabian".
* Since 1089/1024 is (33/32)^2, modifying a Pythagorean interval by [[33/32]] always results in an interval that is considered "Alpharabian".


There's also an additional idea at play which seems to be of slightly lesser importance:
There's also at least one known secondary premise at play:


* As both the Rastma and [[1331/1296]] are subchromas that form differences between members of the 2.11 subgroup and Pythagorean intervals, both of these subchromas belong to a set of intervals defining different interval sets within Alpharabian tuning, and subchromas within this particular interval set help define the differences between Pythagorean, Alpharabian and Betarabian intervals.
* As both the Rastma and [[1331/1296]] are subchromas that form differences between members of the 2.11 subgroup and Pythagorean intervals, both of these subchromas belong to a set of intervals defining different interval sets within Alpharabian tuning, and subchromas within this particular interval set help define the differences between Pythagorean, Alpharabian and Betarabian intervals.