Talk:Chain-of-fifths notation: Difference between revisions
→Sufficient condition: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: Btw it's never dictated that only double sharp to double flat should be used. Without higher-order sharp/flats, larger edos are very limited. 26edo, for example, requires Gx to Abb to access every note in the key of C major. Now modulate to any key with more than three accidentals and boom. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:15, 15 November 2020 (UTC) | : Btw it's never dictated that only double sharp to double flat should be used. Without higher-order sharp/flats, larger edos are very limited. 26edo, for example, requires Gx to Abb to access every note in the key of C major. Now modulate to any key with more than three accidentals and boom. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:15, 15 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: For the record, I have made a two-ring circle chart for 24edo before, and I will say that I have a few tricks for positioning the additional rings relative to one another. If your main ring starts with C-Natural, and F-Demisharp and G-Demiflat are both on the same secondary ring, then the secondary ring is positioned so that F-Demisharp and G-Demiflat are the same distance from C-Natural. However, if your main ring starts with C-Natural, and F-Demisharp and G-Demiflat are on two separate rings, then the two separate secondary rings are perhaps best aligned with the primary ring so that F-Demisharp, C-Natural and G-Demiflat form a straight line. | |||
== Sufficient condition == | == Sufficient condition == | ||
The decisive point for the usability of this notation is, that the representations of octave and fifth are relatively prime. I'd like to introduce this without making the article to a mathematical text, maybe there is somebody willing to help. I also wonder if the precision of the fifth representation is relevant at all. This would open the discussion about really interesting cases like [[23edo]]. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:13, 15 November 2020 (UTC) | The decisive point for the usability of this notation is, that the representations of octave and fifth are relatively prime. I'd like to introduce this without making the article to a mathematical text, maybe there is somebody willing to help. I also wonder if the precision of the fifth representation is relevant at all. This would open the discussion about really interesting cases like [[23edo]]. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:13, 15 November 2020 (UTC) | ||