Talk:144/125: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:::: Ah, great this is of help for you 🙂 - what I think is that [[144/125]] is definitely not ''the'' classic diminished third as well as the whole 5<sup>±3</sup> [[User:Xenwolf/Interval quartet|interval quartet]] of d6, A3, d3, A6 isn't "classic". --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 19:51, 27 September 2020 (UTC) | :::: Ah, great this is of help for you 🙂 - what I think is that [[144/125]] is definitely not ''the'' classic diminished third as well as the whole 5<sup>±3</sup> [[User:Xenwolf/Interval quartet|interval quartet]] of d6, A3, d3, A6 isn't "classic". --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 19:51, 27 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
::::: While I concur with your assessment of [[144/125]] as not being ''the'' classic diminished third, I do have to ask how we distinguish the 5-limit versions of the diminished third, the augmented sixth, the augmented third and the diminished sixth from other varieties... Besides which, as the greater Neapolitan scale and its modes are actually proper modes in 12edo, and we still have to contend with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augmented_sixth_chord augmented sixth chords] appearing in classical music and stuff such, I would think that certain 5-limit augmented thirds, diminished thirds, augmented sixths and diminished sixths should still be counted as "classic" as opposed to just "pental". --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 20:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
== As a comma == | == As a comma == | ||
The idea of tempering out such a big comma confuses me. I read the [[University temperament]] article, I heard the piece. Which actually seems to be in a tuning near [[21edo]]. Isn't this just an error in nomenclature? I appreciate any help for better understanding. Thanks --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 16:01, 27 September 2020 (UTC) | The idea of tempering out such a big comma confuses me. I read the [[University temperament]] article, I heard the piece. Which actually seems to be in a tuning near [[21edo]]. Isn't this just an error in nomenclature? I appreciate any help for better understanding. Thanks --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 16:01, 27 September 2020 (UTC) | ||