User talk:Aura: Difference between revisions

Line 89:

The English ''one, two, three'' is ''uno, due, tre'' in Italian. Because classic music language is mostly (derived from) Italian, both is right. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

: Ah... Still, I assume "tridecimal" is the form we ought to use- for consistency's sake. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 14:26, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:45, 22 September 2020 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →tri vs. tre: new section ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:26, 22 September 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 89:		Line 89:

	The English ''one, two, three'' is ''uno, due, tre'' in Italian. Because classic music language is mostly (derived from) Italian, both is right. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 12:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)		The English ''one, two, three'' is ''uno, due, tre'' in Italian. Because classic music language is mostly (derived from) Italian, both is right. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 12:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

			: Ah... Still, I assume "tridecimal" is the form we ought to use- for consistency's sake. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 14:26, 22 September 2020 (UTC)